ANNUAL REPORT 2003
Contensts
- Prohibited agreements
- Abuse of a dominant position
- Concentration control
- Actions of public and local authorities restricting competition
- Market research
III. International relations
FOREWORD
ROLE AND TASKS
The main purpose of the Competition Council is to enforce the
provisions of LC so that they best serve the progress of the society
Accumulated experience so essential for Lithuania standing at the
threshold of the accession to the European Union that would be an appropriate
generalisation of the work of the Competition Council reviewed in the present Annual
Report for the year 2003. The competition policy implemented jointly by the Competition
Council, as the public authority and the courts has been producing tangible positive
effect upon the market structures and the conduct of market participants. The enhanced
competition among undertakings promotes innovations, reduces production costs and
increases the overall production efficiency. Lithuanian producers are becoming
increasingly competitive in the newly opened European markets, and the values generated by
competition are becoming apparent to growing numbers of Lithuanian consumers benefiting
from improved possibilities to choose from a wider supply of goods and services at lower
prices.
During 2003, specialists of the Competition Council devoted substantial
efforts and attention to the consideration and harmonisation of amendments to the Law on
Competition. Amendments to the Law underlying the activity of the competition authority
are primarily concerned with the direct application of the European Union competition
rules as of May 2004. By assigning appropriate powers by the amendments of the Law on
Competition we have been making very thorough arrangements to get prepared for the day
when Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community will be applied
not only by the European Commission but also by the Competition Council of the Republic of
Lithuania and the Lithuanian Courts.
We fully comprehend the mission assigned to our authority in view of
Lithuanias becoming a Member State of the European Union. First, the Lithuanian
business society may have legitimate expectations that joint efforts will succeed in
overcoming the barriers to competition and defending the public interests. This, however,
will entail enhanced responsibility. Undertakings will be released from the obligation to
apply to the Competition Council for individual exemptions, - agreements restricting
competition, however, satisfying the conditions for exemption will be effective without
any prior administrative decision. This brings about some release for undertakings, at the
same time enhanced liability, since the undertakings will have to make a discretionary
decision on whether or not an agreement is likely to fall within the category of
prohibited agreements. The competition policy implemented by the European Commission
pursues its principal objective - to strengthen the competition processes, hence our task
is to analyse such processes in Lithuania and pass well grounded decisions.
The quality of the investigations conducted and the capacity of our
specialists to collect evidence in order to arrive at legally correct decisions as well as
the correctness of the application of legal proceedings is perhaps best disclosed after
the investigation material is lodged to the court. This also enables to assess the
efficacy of measures applied by the officials of the Competition Council for the purpose
of establishing the most severe infringements of the competition law, - restrictive
agreements and abuse of dominant position. Amendments to the Rules of procedures of the
Competition Council adopted in 2003 have been usefully serving this objective. The policy
implemented by the institution would not be sufficiently efficient unless the supervisory
and monitoring functions are constantly improved, and the decisions passed and sanctions
imposed produce tangible effect.
Concentration control remains among the most important areas of
activity of the Competition Council. In the year 2003, in view of more active merger
processes this assignments required particular scrutiny on the part of the Competition
Council officials. These recent developments are caused, on the one part, by the strive of
companies to more efficiently operate in the market, and on the other - theirs efforts to
attain the size securing their competitiveness under constantly changing market
conditions. The Competition Council has been monitoring the on-going processes in the
former monopolistic State-owned sectors of economy (energy sector, alcohol production and
others) with a view to assessing such processes in accordance with the merger control
requirements thus ensuring an efficient competition in the markets. As an example, in
2003, while monitoring the merger processes in the Lithuanian milk purchase market the
competition authority passed decisions preventing the creation of a dominant position
capable of significantly restricting competition in the market concerned. The Competition
Council also had to deal with issues related to the deepening concentration in the retail
trade sector. The assessment of mergers effected abroad between large companies exercising
significant market power, as well as operating in the Lithuanian markets and generating
income therein has become an increasingly frequent task for our experts. On numerous
occasions complicated cases were successfully resolved due to close cooperation with the
Government and the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Lithuania.
The relevant amendments to the Law on Advertising enabled the
Competition Council to enhance its efficiency in the supervision of misleading or
prohibited comparative advertising, to accelerate the proceedings of sanctioning and
eventually to more efficiently implement the provisions of the said Law.
The Treaty establishing the European Community prohibits State aid,
which distorts competition within the Community. Thus the State aid granted to Lithuanian
enterprises was assessed both in the view of exemptions applied by the European
Commission, and the forthcoming changes to be effected after the European Commission
brings the modernised State aid monitoring regulations into effect. Acting in accordance
with the Law on Monitoring of State Aid to Undertakings in several instances the
Competition Council refused to authorise the intended State aid on the grounds of its
potential effect upon the balance of the competition forces.
During the year 2003, members and specialists of the Competition
Council have been continuing their close cooperation with the representatives of the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and counterpart authorities
of European States. Workshops were held in Vilnius, as well as in other States providing
occasions for specialists of the Competition Council to share experience and introduce the
peculiarities of the investigations conducted thereby to their colleagues. A memorable
event for our institution was the visit to Lithuania of Philip Lowe, Director General of
the Directorate-General for Competition of the European Commission. The visit presented an
opportunity to exchange views on both the prospects for further cooperation and the
development of the competition law and policy. The activities of the Competition Council,
as well as its efforts targeted to strengthening the competitive environment in Lithuania
were positively assessed by the European Commission in its report of 2003 on the progress
made by candidate countries.
The present Report 2003 is not confined to the overview of main
achievements of the Competition Council in its pursuit to safeguard and promote
competition in Lithuania, the paper seeks to familiarize the reader with the most
important guidelines and prospects of the competition policy in Lithuania which we are
prepared to implement successfully upon the accession of Lithuania to the European Union.
Rimantas Stanikūnas
Chairman of the Competition Council
I. Priorities of the Competition Policy
The main task for the Competition Council (further - the CC) is to
ensure sufficient preparedness for the application of the EU competition rules and
operation in the EU legal environment upon the accession of Lithuania into the European
Union. These tasks necessitated the distinction of several priorities in the area of
competition, which were duly reflected in the Pre-accession Economic Program of Lithuania
for the year 2003. The priorities include the tasks to ensure the further harmonisation of
the Lithuanian competition legislation taking due regard of the forthcoming changes in the
EU legislation, establish the procedures for cooperation with the European Commission and
the national competition authorities of other Member States in handling issues of case
investigations and competition policy, ensure the efficient application of competition
rules, enhance the awareness in issues of competition law and application thereof.
Significant attention was devoted to the improvement of the Lithuanian competition
legislation and enhancement of the efficiency of the enforcement of the LC (further - the
LC).
In an attempt to attain the envisaged objectives as a priority task was designated the
further harmonisation of the Lithuanian competition law with the EU acquis.
Amendments to the LC have been drafted in pursuit of further alignment of the procedures
for the investigations of alleged infringements of the LC and the related cases with the
new Council Regulation No. 1/2003, and tightening of the sanctioning policy. Late in 2003,
the proposed amendments were submitted to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania. In
addition to the initiation of drafting of the LC, during the year 2003, other pieces of
national competition legislation were tabled for revision.
1. Development of the framework of legislation
In late 2003, the CC submitted the draft Law on the Amendment and the
Supplement of the LC to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania the subject matter
whereof was declaration of the Law on Monitoring of State Aid to Undertakings void and
introduction of amendments to the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania (further - the
draft Law). The draft was prepared in line with the law harmonisation measures and the acquis
implementation plan for 2003 within the National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis
approved by Resolution No. 292 of 5 March 2003 of the Government of the Republic of
Lithuania, as well as the Decree No. 69 of 22 April 2003 of the Prime Minister of the
Republic of Lithuania (as amended by Decree No. 192 of 21 August 2003). The draft Law was
prepared by the CC working group CC headed by Šarūnas Pajarskas, Head of Administration
of the CC. Comments and proposals concerning the draft Law were also submitted by experts
of the Danish European Institute participating in the project Drafting of competition
legislation in Lithuania launched in 2002 and funded by the Danish Government.
The draft Law pursued two major objectives:
1) provide for the legal prerequisites for efficient enforcement of the
competition policy in Lithuania upon the accession of Lithuania into the European Union,
and assume obligations related to the EU membership;
2) amend (declare void) the provisions which, as practice showed, have
not proved justifiable and supplement the Law with provisions facilitating the CC to more
effectively protect the freedom of fair competition.
On 16 December 2002, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 on
the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the
Treaty (further - the Regulation), which in essence reforms the system for supervision of
prohibited agreements within the meaning of the EC competition law, by replacing the
system of authorisation by the system of directly applicable exemptions and granting the
national authorities of Member States the right and obligation to directly apply
provisions of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community
(further - the Treaty). Direct application of this Regulation and implementation of the EU
competition rules upon the accession of Lithuanian into the EU requires relevant legal
preconditions, which may be established by relevant amendments to the LC and the Code of
Civil Procedure. The draft Law proposed to supplement the LC by a new Chapter
Application of the EU competition rules, which provides that the CC is an
institution authorised to apply the competition rules of the EU, the supervision whereof
within the meaning of the EU competition law has been assigned to national competition
authorities. This provision substantially expands the limits of competence of the CC by
ensuring the simultaneous application of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty and the LC in
the investigations conducted by the CC of whether or not agreements or abuse of dominant
position are capable of affecting trade between Member States in accordance with the
requirements of, respectively, Articles 81 or 82 of the Treaty. Having regard to the fact
that the CC for the purpose of application of the EU competition rules acts in accordance
with the procedure established by the LC the draft Law reviewed the provisions concerning
the procedures for conducting of investigations and imposing of sanctions.
Seeking to align the harmonisation of the regulation of prohibited
agreements under the national and the European law the model of prior authorisation in
respect of agreements between undertakings have been repealed and, upon the enactment of
the draft Law, agreements complying with the established conditions for exemption shall be
effective without any prior authorisation to that effect by the CC being required.
Since the national courts shall have the power and the obligations to
directly apply Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty the draft Law governs the peculiarities of
the legal proceedings of the competition cases. To that purpose the Code of Civil
proceedings will have to be supplemented so that competition cases are investigated in
accordance with the provisions of the Code with an exception established by the LC. Upon
receipt of complaints related to the scope of application of Articles 81 and 82 of the
Treaty the court shall notify thereof the European Commission and the CC which at their
own initiative may submit comments on the application of Articles 81 or 82, shall be
entitled to familiarize themselves with the particulars of the case, provide explanations
and evidence, participate in the proceedings dealing with the case, and submit requests.
The draft Law also provides for an additional basis for the renewal of the case ensuring
the possibility for the parties of the proceedings to protect their rights where the
application of Articles 81 or 82 as ruled by the court contradicts the decision of the
European Commission concerning the application of the Articles in question.
The draft Law provides for material changes in the area of
implementation of concentration control. The practice shows that some markets (services
markets in particular) may effect concentrations without having notified the CC thereof,
by virtue of their minimum income ratios being below the thresholds invoking the
obligation to apply to the CC for authorisation of the concentration. Thus the draft Law
proposes to authorise the CC to independently initiate the concentration control
proceedings in cases where less than 12 months have elapsed after the merger has been put
into effect. The basis for the refusal to grant the authorisation of the concentration was
considerably expanded having regard to the draft Council Regulation on the control of
concentrations between undertakings. The binding instruction to the undertakings to
suspend the concentration after submission of the notification to the CC was also
repealed. Undertakings will have a discretionary right to choose at which stage of the
implementation to notify the CC thereof (prior to the realisation of concentration).
The Law on Monitoring of State Aid to Undertakings stipulates that
State aid control is being implemented by the CC in the procedure established by the said
Law. Upon Lithuanias accession to the EU this function shall be implemented by the
European Commission since by virtue of Article 88 (ex 93) of the Treaty the European
Commission has been granted appropriate powers to decide on whether or not a State aid is
compatible with the common market and the requirements of the European law. The Treaty as
well as Council Regulation (EC) No. 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules
for the application of Article 88 (ex 93) of the EC Treaty will become directly applicable
as of 1 May 2004. Therefore the Law on Monitoring of State Aid to Undertakings is proposed
to be declared void as of that date, alongside supplementing the LC by a provision that
the CC is a coordinating institution concerning all matters related to State aid subject
to the relevant rules of the EU. In the manner provided by the Government of the Republic
of Lithuania the CC shall perform the expert examination of the intended State aid,
participates in the process of notifying the European Commission of State aid, and submits
conclusions and recommendations to State aid providers. The preliminary assessment of
intended State aid by the CC and conclusions of advisory nature would be equally
beneficial to State aid providers as well as the undertakings of the Republic of
Lithuania. This would enable them to avoid problems related to granting of State aid in
contravention of the effective legislation of the European Community. In addition, the CC
will be assigned the responsibility to maintain the Register of State aid (including de
minimis aid).
Beyond any doubt, the adoption and the implementation of the Law will
have a significant impact upon the development of the competition law; enhance the
efficiency of the CC in its pursuit to protect the freedom of fair competition.
The European Commission in its Regular Report of 2003 on Lithuanias
progress towards accession noted that Lithuania in essence is fully capable to fulfil its
negotiation commitments and requirements in the area of competition and upon accession to
the EU Lithuania will be able to enforce the relevant acquis. Nearing the
completion of the pre-accession stage Lithuania is expected to approve a more stringent
sanctioning policy and continue to enhance the efficiency of enforcement of competition
rules. Furthermore, Lithuania should continue to monitor the appropriate application and
the implementation of State aid legislation in particular, in the area of aid for rescuing
and restructuring of enterprises.
2. Integration into the European Union
After the signature of the Treaty of Accession on 16 April 2003,
Lithuania was invited to join the activity of the appropriate European institutions
wherein it was assigned the observer status. The period preceding the full membership of
the EU was designated as the time devoted to information and consulting procedure pursuant
to which Lithuania will be entitled to present its views concerning the enforcement of the
newly adopted EU legislation. Although enjoying the observer status rights in the same
manner as all other States seeking the EU membership, Lithuania was able to present its
views in the course of the negotiations during the meetings of the working groups of the
European Council, the Permanent Representatives Committee (COREPER), and the Council
Ministers. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania was coordinating
all activities related to the EU institutions, next to performing other assignments was
hosting the meetings of the Delegation for EU Accession Negotiations which were also
attended by CC representatives. Since in the year 2003 the COREPER was considering the new
Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings, experts of the
CC submitted the official position of Lithuania to the Delegation for EU Accession
Negotiations. Late in 2003, following the extensive discussions in the working group of
the CC and deliberations in the COREPER the Regulation was approved by joint political
consent.
Representatives of the CC were regularly invited to participate in
meetings of the competition working group of the Council the agenda whereof include d the
discussion of the draft new Regulation. Twelve such meetings were held in the period
between 16 April 2003 and the end of the year, and the CC representatives participated in
three such meetings, and one meeting was attended by the representative of the Mission of
the Republic of Lithuania to the European Communities.
In accordance with par. 1 of Article 52 of the Treaty of Accession
representatives of the CC were delegated to the following advisory committees of the
European Commission: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions,
Advisory Committee on Agreements and Dominant Positions in the Air Transport, Advisory
Committee on Agreements and Dominant Positions in the Maritime Transport, Advisory
Committee on Restrictive Practices and Monopolies in the Transport Industry, Advisory
Committee on Concentrations. The Committees deal with cases related to abuse of a dominant
positions and prohibited agreements, cases of mergers between undertakings where
conclusions are tabled to the Commission for the final decision, the Committees also
consider draft regulations and other important issues of the competition policy. Of
special significance for the CC experts was the participation in the meetings of the
Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions considering the draft
legislation implementing Council Regulation No. 1/2003/EC.
Furthermore, in accordance with the Regulation of the Council on the
application of Articles 92 and 93 of the Treaty an official of the CC was appointed as a
representative to the Advisory Committee on State aid. The meetings of this committee
deliberate draft legislation related to State aid and present conclusions to the European
Commission, the Committee also devotes some time to the assessment of the notifications of
Member States on the provisions of State aid.
Since April 2003 representatives of the CC attended nine meetings of
the above Committees.
Special arrangements related to the implementation as of 1 May 2004 of
the EU Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the
rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty. For the purpose of the
implementation of the said Regulation the officials of the CC were extensively involved in
the activities of the Implementation working group European Competition Network (ECN).
Specialists of the CC attended six plenary meetings of the working group and six meetings
of the sub-group of the ECN Exchange of information the agenda whereof included the
discussion of issues related to the implementation of the new Council Regulation with
special focus on the cooperation between national competition authorities and the European
Commission.
Information required for the operation of the ECN group on the
implementation of the LC, powers of the CC (imposition of sanctions, sanction reduction,
and exemption from penalties in accordance with the LC, procedures established by the CC)
was provided to the ECN management system on ECN Intranet (accessible via CIRCA)
established by the European Commission.
In the same manner as in previous years exhaustive information on the
investigations conducted during 2002, the deliberated competition cases as well as
statistics on the provided State aid was being provided to the Directorate General for
Competition. Similarly, as part of monitoring function, information on the implementation
of the EU acquis in the area of competition was provided to the European Commission
and the meeting of the EU-Lithuania sub-committee No. 2 on internal market issues held on
22 May 2003 in Brussels.
During the year 2003 the CC was continuing to provide information and
the data to supplement and update the database on the progress of harmonization of
national legislation with the European Community law operated by the TAIEX Bureau of the
European Commission.
In October 2003, for the first time the European Commission and the
Economic and Financial Committee called Lithuania to submit the National Report on
Economic Reforms (the so-called Cardiff Report on Product and Capital Markets). The
contribution in the preparation of the Report was the submission to the Competition policy
and State aid chapter covering issues related to the fundamentals of policies of
competition and monitoring of State aid and the enforcement thereof.
II. THE PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPETITION COUNCIL
During 2003, the activities of the CC were mainly
focused upon its functions of the enforcement of the LC, the Law on Monitoring of State
Aid to Undertakings and the Law on Advertising. The Graph below shows the breakdown of
Resolutions passed by the CC by areas related to enforcement of the three said Laws. The
most important investigations are given a more thorough review in further Chapters of the
present Report.
1. Enforcement of the LC
During the year 2003, acting in accordance with the LC the CC initiated
72 investigations, including 4 initiated by the institution itself, while the remaining
investigations were started against requests lodged by various undertakings. Having
applied the relevant provisions of the LC the institution passed 73 decisions.
| Decisions reached | Initiated investigations | |
| Total number of cases | 73 | 72 |
| Prohibited agreements | 7 | 9 |
| Abuse of dominance | 6 | 3 |
| Mergers | 53 | 55 |
| Restrictive actions of public and local authorities | 7 | 5 |
| Prohibited agreements | ||
| Horizontal agreements | Vertical agreements | |
| New cases opened | 9 | 1 |
| New notifications/applications | 1 | 1 |
| New own initiative procedures | 4 | |
| New complaints | 4 | |
| Decisions reached | 7 | |
| Rejection of complaint decisions | 5 | |
| Exemption decisions | 1 | |
| Prohibition decisions | ||
| Prohibition with fines decisions | 1 | |
| Court rulings | ||
| Abuse of dominance | ||
| New cases | 3 | |
| New own initiative procedures | ||
| New complaints | 3 | |
| Decisions reached | 6 | |
| Rejection of complaint decisions | 5 | |
| Prohibition decisions | ||
| Prohibition with fines decisions | 1 | |
| Court rulings | 2 | |
| Concentration | ||
| Decisions reached | 53 | |
| Approvals | 48 | |
| Conditional approvals | 6 | |
| Prohibitions | ||
| Rejected notifications | 1 | |
| Court rulings | ||
The overview of the performance of the enforcement function by the CC
proves significant improvement in the quality of the investigations conducted, as well as
the legal completeness of such investigations. Some investigations were extensive, time
consuming and complicated which in the first place holds true of the investigations
conducted in the information technologies, transport fuels and service markets.
Prohibited agreements
In March 2003, prompted by the information submitted by the
Head of the Commission Delegation in Lithuania on the alleged agreement among enterprises
participating in the PHARE tender the CC started an investigation on its own initiative.
The objective of the investigation was to establish the compliance of actions of
enterprises participating in the tender called in 2002 by PHARE "Procurement of
information technologies designed to strengthen the capacity of the Ministry of
Agriculture and related institutions to manage and administer EU aquis for
agriculture and rural development with Art. 5 of the LC. Bidders for the tender were
four companies, competitors in the information technologies market UAB Aideta, UAB
Blue Bridge, UAB Techna Orbis and UAB CompServis. The tender object,
valued at EUR 499,094 (around LTL 1,723,000) is regarded a large tender object in the
Lithuanian market for information technologies. The gross annual income of the three
companies suspected as having concluded the agreement amounted to LTL 70,140,585. Two of
the tendering companies were holding leading positions in the said market. Such agreements
between companies distort competition in the market and deprive other competitors of
possibilities to win tenders on fair terms, and thus operate in the market under equal
competitive conditions.
Within the investigation the CC performed the analysis of parts of the
tender bids, i.e. the technical specifications submitted by the bidders. It was
established that the technical specifications submitted by three competing bidders, - UAB
Blue Bridge, UAB Aideta and UAB Techna Orbis, were expressly similar,
containing a number of identical items. The arrangement of the chapters of the technical
specifications was identical, tables looked the same, contained identical mistakes, the
three companies used the same font for the text, and it was also established that bids of
the three companies specified hardware of the same names, types and models. The hardware
offered by the three companies was identical, although the tender documentation specified
only the minimum technical requirements thus leaving sufficient room for selection of the
hardware by the bidders at own discretion. Only the hardware offered by the fourth company
was entirely different. Such coincidences in the technical specifications of the tender
bids could not have possibly occurred if the companies were preparing their bids
independently and they gave sufficient grounds to suspect the bidders of an intention to
submit coordinated bids for the tender. The similarities of the technical specifications
of the bids submitted by three companies allowed a conclusion that the bids were executed
and documented in one company, actually in one computer file. As it turned out, UAB
Blue Bridge was the first to develop the technical specification which was later on,
having adjusted some items of the specification and made some other insignificant changes
were passed to the other two, i.e., UAB Aideta and UAB Techna Orbis. The
findings were well proven by all facts established in the case: staff members of the
competing UAB Aideta, UAB Blue Bridge and UAB Techna Orbis
responsible for the preparation of the tender bids were corresponding by electronic mail
thus coordinating the process of preparation of the tender bids and drafting documents for
their competitors.
The investigation also established that the tenders submitted by the
three companies contained identical mistakes basically related to the information on
warranty clauses of their bids. The fact-finding actions established that UAB Blue
Bridge drafted the application to participate in the tender, which later on was sent
to its competitors UAB Aideta and UAB Techna Orbis, the task for the latter
being just to sign and fax it at the specified fax number to the procuring organisation.
Thus UAB Blue Bridge prepared the application to participate in the tender on
behalf of its two competitors UAB Techna Orbis and UAB Aideta.
All these established actions produced sufficient evidence that UAB
Blue Bridge, UAB Aideta and UAB Techna Orbis had agreed to submit
coordinated bids in the tender concerned thus concluding an agreement prohibited by the
LC. Furthermore, the companies agreed that the tender would be awarded to UAB Blue
Bridge. The intended winner of the tender, upon the agreement of the three companies
worked out the price calculations and offered the lowest price. The companies had
concluded an agreement under which UAB Blue Bridge actually did not compete with UAB
Aideta and UAB Techna Orbis that in their turn allowed the said company to win
in the tender.
In the course of the investigation all the three companies made
statements by which they actually confessed of having concluded the agreement in
contradiction to Art. 5 of the LC. This was the first official statement made by
undertakings to have ever been made in the history of investigations of prohibited
agreements by the CC. Such voluntary cooperation on the part of the companies in the
course of the investigation, the timely submission of the necessary information in
addition to the requested explanations was extremely helpful to the authorised officials
of the CC to rapidly complete the investigation and thus reduce its costs. The
investigation of the prohibited agreement was completed in a record short time - 4 months.
For the purpose of passing a final decision concerning the penalty such cooperation by the
companies the actions whereof were subject to the investigation was considered, as
provided in par. 2 of Art. 42 of the LC, extenuating circumstances.
Having regard to the fact that the companies confessed to have
concluded prohibited agreement and rendered assistance to the officials of the CC, also
that no aggravating circumstances were established as related to the infringements the CC
imposed the following fines: to UAB Blue Bridge - LTL 50,000, to UAB Aideta
and UAB Techna Orbis, respectively, LTL 20,000 and LTL 10,000.
Telecommunications
The CC carried out a full-scale investigation, which was initiated on
the basis of a complaint filed by UAB Bitė GSM. The applicant claimed that rates
applied to the calls from the fixed telephone line to the mobile telecommunications
network of UAB Bitė GSM may be discriminatory as compared to rates effective for
calls from the fixed telephone to UAB Omnitel mobile network.
The applicant stated that action of AB Lietuvos Telekomas whereby
it transmits the domestic calls as international may be assessed as the imposition of
unfair prices and terms by an operator dominating in the telephone calls transit market.
UAB Bitė GSM claimed that the difference in the rates for
domestic call termination in the UAB Omnitel network and that of international call
termination in the UAB Omnitel network maintained in the new network connection
agreement concluded between AB Lietuvos Telekomas and UAB Omnitel may be
regarded as an agreement between two related undertakings imposing unfair prices and terms
for other market participants.
The CC examined the complaint lodged by UAB Bitė GSM and did
not establish any infringements committed by AB Lietuvos Telekomas.
Dairy market
As ordered by the Prime Minister the CC carried out an
investigation of the milk purchase market with a view to establishing a possible agreement
between the dairy processing enterprises for fixing the milk purchase prices. The CC
conducted a thorough analysis of all circumstances related to the reduction of the milk
purchase prices. The objects of the analysis were the dates of price cuts, reduction
rates, methods of fixing and adjustment of purchase prices by the dairy processing
enterprises, as well as the operation of the milk purchase market. Officials of the CC did
not establish any agreements or concerted practices by the major Lithuanian milk
processing enterprises. The analysis showed that the reduction of the milk purchase prices
were primarily caused by economic factors, such as the fall of such prices in foreign
markets, the devaluation of the US dollar, severe competition on the domestic market which
all in combination prevented the enterprises from the increase of the milk purchase
prices. All these factors were basically pertinent to major milk processing enterprises,
which sell most of their output in foreign markets.
The investigation, however, did not establish any evidence that milk
processors had been engaged in some kind of agreement and/or concerted practices for the
purpose of fixing the milk purchase prices.
Payment cards
An investigation carried out by the CC concerned the compliance of
actions of AB Vilniaus bankas and AB bank NORD/LB Lietuva with the
requirements of Art. 5 of the LC.
The investigation was initiated by the institution itself prompted by
the information published in the press in April 2003 claiming that on 31 March 2003 AB
Vilniaus bankas and AB bank NORD/LB Lietuva agreed on the joint network of cash
dispensers (ATMs). The contract provided that all customers holding payment cards issued
by AB Vilniaus bankas and AB bank NORD/LB Lietuva could withdraw cash or
check the account balance in all ATMs operated by the contracting banks under the same
terms as those established by the bank issuing the card.
Having analysed the contract of AB Vilniaus bankas and AB
bank NORD/LB Lietuva it was established that the contract did not provide for the cash
withdrawal charge, as this was established by each of the banks independently.
The investigation concluded that the agreement between AB Vilniaus
bankas and AB bank NORD/LB Lietuva - the two competing operators of the
financial services market - to fix identical terms for cash withdrawal in own ATMs and
those of the contracting party was not capable of restricting the possibilities of each of
the banks to unilaterally fix the charge for cash withdrawal in ATMs operated thereby,
i.e., the agreement does not produce any restrictive affect upon the competition between AB
Vilniaus bankas and AB bank NORD/LB Lietuva, hence the allegations on the
infringement of Art. 5 of the LC were ruled out.
Goods carriage by motorcars
In March the CC conducted the investigation the purpose whereof
being to establish the compliance of actions of Linava, the Lithuanian National
Road Carriers Association and its members with the requirements of Art. 5 of the LC. The
investigation was started by the CC on its own initiative on the basis of the information
published by the Lithuanian News Agency ELTA and the address to the Lithuanian road
carriers published in the website of Linava. The text of the address allowed a
suggestion that the goods carriers were indirectly prompted to recalculate the costs of
goods transportation and increase the rates for the goods transport services. This raised
a suspicion that the Association Linava and its members seeking to establish new
goods carriage rates intended to perform actions potentially in contravention of the LC.
It was established that the inducement by the Association Linava
and its members to coordinate their business decisions in relation to the increase of the
transportation rates (recalculation of goods carriage costs and the rates of the goods
transportation services) had not been of the scope that could possibly produce a negative
effect upon competition. The initiated investigation prevented Linava from putting
its intentions into operation. Although the CC terminated its investigation, it continued
to further observe the actions of Linava and its members to avert any attempts of
coordinated price increase.
The Association Linava was invited to notify all its members
that in accordance with par. 1 of Art. 5 of the LC all agreements which have as their
object the restriction of competition or which may restrict competition shall be
prohibited and are void from the moment of conclusion thereof.
Block exemption in the office paper market
The CC examined the notification filed by UAB Papyrus
Distribution and UAB Mabivil on the vertical agreement qualifying for a block
exemption. The office paper market is an extremely rapidly developing market in Lithuania
including 10 wholesale operators, five of which are members of the Baltic Association of
Paper companies, and about 50 retailers. It was established that the said notification
complies with the requirements of par. 4 of Art. 7 of the LC which stipulates that undertakings
must within an established time limit after the coming into effect of
the agreement concluded according to the conditions of block exemption present information
on the principal conditions of the agreement to the CC.
Block exemption in the maritime transport market
In 2003, upon the request of AB LISCO Baltic Service the CC
carried out an investigation seeking to establish the compliance of the German-Lithuanian
conference agreement between AB LISCO Baltic Service and the company Scandlines
AG with the requirements of the Resolution of the C C On granting of a block
exemption to certain agreements between transport undertakings in individual branches of
the transport sector in accordance with Articles 5, 6 and 7 of the LC of the Republic of
Lithuania.
It was decided to confirm that the German-Lithuanian conference
agreement between AB LISCO Baltic Service and Scandlines AG as notified by
the applicant complies with the terms laid down in Resolution No. 11 of 18 January 2001 of
the CC On granting of a block exemption to certain agreements between transport
undertakings in individual branches of the transport sector in accordance with Articles 5,
6 and 7 of the LC of the Republic of Lithuania.
Abuse of a dominant position
Sugar market
The object of the investigation initiated on the basis of the
notification of the agricultural cooperative Kėdainių krašto cukriniai runkeliai
was to establish on whether or not the clause of the interprofessional agreement of AB
Danisco sugar Panevėžys and AB Danisco sugar Kėdainiai complies with
provisions of Art. 9 of the LC. The agreement was concluded in 2002 among the said sugar
factories and 5 cooperatives of sugar beet growers, and contained the provision, which
prohibited the sugar beet growers to deliver the sugar beets for processing where the
sugar beets were grown from the seeds acquired from other sources than the sugar
factories. During the investigation it was established that Danisco factoring
prohibiting the sugar beet growers from delivering for processing the sugar beets grown
from the seeds acquired from elsewhere than the factories, were abusing their dominant
position thus restricting the freedom of the economic activity of the sugar growers and
restricting competition in the wholesale seed market. Being allotted certain sugar beet
growing quotas and obliged to purchase the sugar beet seeds exclusively from the factories
the sugar beet growers are made dependant upon the factories and the sugar processing
factories are then able to unilaterally fix the price for sugar beet seeds. By imposing
the obligation upon the sugar beet growers to purchase the seeds exclusively from the
factories and providing that the payment for the seeds is effected upon the delivery of
the sugar beets Danisco restricted the possibilities of the sugar beet growers to
opt for other more acceptable payment terms or choose other seed suppliers.
In the course of the investigation Danisco factories submitted
the data on the adjustments in the existing system for selling of sugar beet seeds to
sugar beet growers proving that the liberalisation of trade in seeds is related to
substantial costs, which would have an appreciable affect on the competitiveness of the
sector. In addition, having regard to the findings of the investigation Danisco
factories submitted the provisions of new agreement on the sale of sugar beet seeds
intended to make part of the interprofessional agreement for the year 2004. In order to
analyse the impact of the provisions of the produced agreements upon the liberalisation of
the market for the sugar beet seeds and assess the compliance of such provisions with the
LC, the investigation was extended until the completion of the negotiations concerning the
conclusion of the interprofessional agreement between Danisco factories and the
cooperatives of sugar beet growers.
Mortuary services
The investigation was initiated on the basis of the application lodged
by UAB Kremata, which indicated that A. Jankauskas service and trade undertaking
is the only company in the town of Biržai leasing the mortuary premises. According to the
applicant the lessor of the mortuary premises also required the customer to acquire all
related funeral articles exclusively from it in the opposite case the customers were
refused the service.
The investigation established that such actions of A. Jankauskas
service and trade company restricted the possibilities of other undertakings to operate in
the mortuary article and services market thus violating the customers interests.
Taking into consideration the fact that A. Jankauskas mortuary
services and trade enterprise having violated the provisions of the LC submitted all the
information necessary for the investigation of alleged abuse of dominance and that no
material or irretrievable damage to the interests of another undertakings or the society
was incurred by prohibited actions under investigation, A. Jankauskas mortuary services
and trade enterprise was subjected to a minimum fine of LTL 3,000.
Insurance market
In September 2002 an investigation was initiated with a view to
establishing possible infringements of Art. 5 and 9 of the LC according to the
notification presented by the insurance company AB Lietuvos draudimas on the
allegedly prohibited agreement between AB Lietuvos žemės ūkio bankas and the AB
Lietuvos žemės ūkio banko draudimas. In its notification AB Lietuvos draudimas
was claiming that it was approached by UAB Lekėčiai with a request to terminate
the livestock insurance agreement since the Šakiai division of the AB Lietuvos žemės
ūkio bankas was crediting UAB Lekėčiai and one of crediting condition is to
insure the livestock in UAB Lietuvos žemės ūkio banko draudimas .
The investigation established that in accordance with the provisions of
the LC AB Lietuvos žemės ūkio bankas and UAB Lietuvos žemės ūkio banko
draudimas should be treated as a single undertaking because they are interrelated by
mutual control and do not operate in the market independently while organising their
economic activities. Prohibitions laid down in par. 1 of Art. 5 of the LC are not
applicable to agreements concluded by undertakings that are to be treated as a single
entity.
Having assessed the compliance of actions of AB Lietuvos žemės
ūkio bankas and UAB Lietuvos žemės ūkio banko draudimas with the
requirements set forth in Art. 9 of the LC the CC concluded that AB Lietuvos žemės
ūkio bankas isnt dominating in the Lithuanian market of agricultural loans since
no barriers for other undertakings to enter the market were established. From the banks
point of view the agriculture sector is related to high risks, and crediting of
agricultural activities is not a priority area of activity of the banks that therefore do
not intend to significantly increase their market shares in this particular sector.
Goods carriage by motorcars
The CC examined the application presented by L. Karpavičius PE
Talka concerning abuse of a dominant position. The applicant claimed that the National
Road Carriers Association Linava was abusing its dominant position when charging
different prices for TIR Carnets issues to members of the Association and the candidate
members, thus placing them at a competitive disadvantage.
The Association Linava has been assigned an exclusive right to
issue TIR Carnets as a guaranteeing association in accordance with the Customs Convention
on the International Transport of Goods under Cover of TIR Carnets. It was established
that by charging different prices for TIR Carnets for members of the Association and its
candidate members Linava did not create different competitive conditions for
national road carriers, because all undertakings have equal conditions to fulfil the
relevant requirements and become regular members of the Association. The differentiation
in the charges for the TIR Cornets is justified since according to the data of the
Association Linava members and candidate members of the Association are considered
not equally reliable. The risk assumed by the Association in respect of candidate members
is higher than that in relation to its regular members. The difference in the prices for
the TIR Carnets were established in view of different administrative costs incurred while
issuing them to members and candidates of the Association.
Having examined the factual data the CCl resolved that under the
provisions of Art. 9 of the LC there was no legal basis for the assumption that by
establishing different prices for TIR Carnets issued to its members and candidate members
the Association was abusing its dominant position in the market concerned. The
applicants allegation that Linava was distributing the TIR Carnets to its
members at the price below costs was also found groundless.
Concentration control
During the year 2003, the CC received 54 notifications concerning
approvals to implement concentrations of market structures. On 52 occasions the
concentrations were approved by appropriate resolutions of the CC. Those included 6 cases
of conditional approvals seeking to avoid the creation or strengthening of a dominant
position. The examination of 3 notifications is being continued throughout the year 2004.
One undertaking withdrew its notification on the intended merger, in 5 cases, where the CC
was seeking to expedite the decision making process, and where it was apparent that the
implementation of the merger will not result in a creation of a dominant position or
restriction of competition and pursuant to par. 3 of Art. 12 of the LC it was permitted to
exercise individual actions of concentrations pending the adoption of final decision.
The 2003 recorded 10 approvals to implement the concentration to
foreign entities, which is a reduction as compared to 15 such approvals in 2002. In 5
cases the mergers were enacted between undertakings registered abroad although operating
in the Lithuanian product markets, and the mergers would raise the degree of concentration
in Lithuania. In 5 cases foreign undertakings acquired undertakings registered in
Lithuania, which included 4 cases of horizontal concentrations and 1 case of conglomerate
concentration.
In other 42 cases, which were placed to the CC for examination, mergers
were implemented by undertakings registered in Lithuania, including 6 approvals to
Lithuanian undertakings controlled by foreign capital, and in 5 approved cases Lithuanian
and the foreign capital jointly controlled the merging undertakings. In 23 cases the
mergers were considered as horizontal mergers. These included 5 cases in the trade sector,
8 cases in industry sector, 3 cases in construction sector, and 2 cases were recorded in
each of the finance, agriculture, information technologies sectors, 1 merger was approved
in the energy sector. In 3 cases the mergers were considered bearing features of
horizontal merger, in 5 cases mergers were vertical and in 9 cases the mergers were
recognised as conglomerate.
Changes in the development of merger processes in Lithuania are very
insignificant, as it is very obvious from the data presented in the Table below.
DEVELOPMENT OF CONCENTRATION CASES
| Years | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 |
| Notifications received | 57 | 47 | 52 | 54 |
| Approvals issued | 48 | 43 | 48 | 52 |
However, the comparison of the number of horizontal concentrations
effected in 2003 to that of the previous year showed an increase, concentrations have
become more frequent in the industry, construction and agricultural sectors. Although
notifications on concentration in the trade sector were fewer, concentrations among small
trade companies not subject to the notification requirements under par. 1 of Art. 10 of
the LC became more common.
In 2003, out of five major trade networks only UAB Baltishes Haus
submitted one notification and was granted an approval to perform the concentration. Three
mandatory notifications of concentration were submitted by network Aibė, which is
related to UAB VP Market. The network Aibė, however, unites, on contractual
basis, small traders mostly from regional areas, settlements, small towns, which benefit
from larger rebates offered by the centralised procurement facilities. Major trade
networks were expanding mostly through opening new modern trading outlets. The expansion
of trade networks UAB VP Market and Aibė in Latvia promoted exports of
products of Lithuanian producers, in particular, the food products, also facilitated the
imports of Latvian products into Lithuania, which brought about some new stimulus into the
level of competition in the Lithuanian markets. Trade networks in regions areas are
expanding and now offering to relatively lower-income consumers staple goods at
significantly lower prices.
It has increasingly often becoming a case where undertakings and legal
firms representing them prior to submitting concentration notifications seek advise from
specialists of the CC. Upon learning of a possibility in a particular case that a dominant
position may be created and the consequent restriction of competition they, quite
infrequently, abandon their intentions to effect concentration or withdraw their
concentration notifications.
On a single occasion the CC approved the notified concentration despite
certain restricting clauses in the contracts, i.e. the contracts contained the
non-competing clauses effective for an established time period. The presence of the
non-competing clauses is justified by the need to ensure that the acquired tangible and
intangible assets (such as the companys goodwill, experience, know-how), constituting a
large part of the assets being acquired would not be devaluated immediately after the take
over.
In certain cases while granting the approvals to perform concentrations
due regard was given to the forthcoming EU membership which entails abolition of
administrative barriers (customs duties, non-tariff measures and other barriers), and the
possible redefinition of geographical markets.
In certain cases seeking to ensure transparency of accounting in the
relevant markets, implement the principles of non-discrimination, and to prevent the
cross-subsidising of goods (services), possible coordination of actions by competitors,
increase of economic power, which may result in restricting effect, the CC granted
conditional approvals for concentration. One of such cases was recorded in the alcoholic
beverages market where UAB Mineraliniai Vandenys acquired AB Stumbras by way
of privatisation.
As early as 2002, while assessing the compliance of actions by AB
Stumbras by granting rebates and arranging for settlement for advertising services
with the provisions of the LC, the CC established the dominance of AB Stumbras in
the market for strong alcoholic beverages. UAB Mineraliniai Vandenys was awarded
the public privatisation tender called by the SE Turto Fondas. UAB Mineraliniai
Vandenys was operating in the alcoholic beverages (imported, as well as locally
produced) wholesale market. Besides, the CC established possible concerted actions in the
relevant market on the basis that AB Stumbras was holding a 10% interest in UAB
Artrio-2 and, accordingly, was participating in the management of the latter. At the
same time a 10% holding of UAB Artrio 22 was held by AB Alita, which was
also participating in the management of this company. AB Alita is the second
largest producer of alcoholic beverages in Lithuania, being the largest producer of
sparkling wines. UAB Artrio-2 was tendering in the privatisation tender relating to
AB Anykščių Vynas privatisation announced by the SE Turto Fondas and was
awarded the privatisation tender. AB Anykščių Vynas also produces strong
alcoholic beverages and certain kinds of wine. Provisions of the Law on Alcohol Control
established the State monopoly in the strong alcoholic beverages production market to be
effective until 1 January 2004. Therefore any increase in competition in this market may
be possibly expected only after the alcoholic beverages market is liberalised, after part
of producers of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages will be able to launch the
production of strong alcoholic beverages without the need to allocate substantial
investment. Imported strong beverages can hardly substitute the supply of local producers,
basically due to the substantial difference in prices, as well as quality standards, and,
finally, the preferences on the part of Lithuanian consumers to local production. However,
after the accession of Lithuania to the EU and the abolition of all trade barriers, AB
Stumbras would have to face competition not only from the part of the EU producers,
but also that from the neighbouring States enjoying a zero rate EU customs tariff.
Having regard to the circumstances as described above, the CC decided
to approve UAB Mineraliniai Vandenys to effect concentration by acquiring up to
100% shareholding of AB Stumbras according to the submitted notification subject to
the following terms and conditions of the concentration:
1. Having acquired the control of AB Stumbras and having taken
over the management of the company, UAB Mineraliniai Vandenys is obligated to sell
all shares of UAB Artrio-2 it currently owns;
2. The time limit for the above transaction is deemed confidential.
3. Having acquired the control of AB Stumbras and having taken
over the management of the company, UAB Mineraliniai Vandenys is obligated to
recall the representative delegated by AB Stumbras from the management board of UAB
Artrio-2;
4. To sell the shares of UAB Artrio-2 to an undertaking deemed
under the requirements prescribed by the CC not related to UAB Mineraliniai Vandenys.
The CC also imposed an obligation upon the parties to appropriately
notify the CC of the performance and the course of any equity transactions, which shall be
subject to the latters approval. Upon an individual request the CC may decide to extend
the time limit for the sale transaction for a period duly grounded as necessary to
complete the sales transaction.
In order to prevent discrimination and dissimilar competitive terms AB
Stumbras was obligated in its contracts with other undertakings to establish prices
and other terms, which are comparable to those established in the contracts with UAB
Mineraliniai Vandenys.
During the year 2003, the Lithuanian dairy sector (milk purchase and
dairy products sector) was undergoing further concentration processes.
In this respect the most important case for the CC was the case of the
concentration of AB Panevėžio Pienas and AB Rokiškio Sūris. This
particular case investigated was challenging to the competition authority both in terms of
establishing the type of concentration, and in terms of defining the markets. The
notification of the intended concentration was submitted four times, in three cases it was
withdrawn, where each time the applicant would indicate a different size of targeted
shareholding, and emphasise that the main purpose of the concentration effected by AB
Rokiškio Sūris is to acquire an interest in AB Panevėžio Pienas of the size
ensuring a significant influence in the process of decision making while preventing any
devaluation of shares.
In April the CC examined the notification submitted on 12 March 2003 by
AB Rokiškio Sūris on intended concentration by acquiring up to 35.3% shareholding
in AB Panevėžio Pienas. Acting in accordance with item 2 of par. 1 of Art. 14 of
the LC the CC passed a decision of conditional approval permitting for AB Rokiškio
Sūris to effect concentration by acquiring up to 35.3% shareholding of AB
Panevėžio Pienas pursuing to avoid the creation of a dominant position:
1. AB Rokiškio Sūris is obligated to refrain from voting by
all previously and additionally acquired voting shares of AB Panevėžio Pienas in
the general AB Panevėžio Pienas meetings of shareholders on the following issues:
distribution of profit;
formation, distribution and liquidation of reserves not available for
distribution;
sale, transfer, lease or mortgage of fixed assets the value whereof
amounts to over 1/20 of the companys authorised capital, as well as offering guarantee
or surety for the discharge of obligations of other entities.
2. Any additional acquisitions of the shares of AB Panevėžio
Pienas and (or) other actions of concentration (e.g. for the purpose of coordinating
of business decisions between the shareholders of AB Panevėžio Pienas and the
related undertakings) shall be approved by the CC.
The peculiarity of this particular case of concentration stems from the
fact that the companies operate in the same market - milk purchase and dairy product
markets. The concentration to be effected was assessed as horizontal concentration
significantly affecting the degree of concentration in the relevant milk purchase and
unskimmed milk product markets. Since in these relevant markets the share of AB
Rokiškio Sūris and AB Pieno Žvaigždės would account for, respectively,
approximately 61% and 60%, only AB Žemaitijos Pienas is a comparable competitor
for them, and other participants of the relevant markets are rather small, the
concentration could result in the creation of a dominant position which could have a
restrictive affect upon competition in these relevant markets.
In the course of the assessment of this particular concentration the
issues of acquisition of control were placed under particular scrutiny, inasmuch as the
entity effecting the concentration had no objections as to the market definition, market
shares held and the assessment of the impact of the intended concentration upon the
market. Besides, account was taken of the fact that all three entities were operating in
the same markets, i.e., the milk purchase and dairy products markets. This enhances the
probability of the entities opting to pursue a joint strategy, or to otherwise coordinate
their actions in the markets concerned, which may take the form of agreements on the
settlement terms, sharing of milk purchase markets, dairy products marketing prices or
application of trade rebates.
AB Rokiškio Sūris acknowledged the fact that the acquisition
of the veto right is commensurate to the acquisition of control. The CC took due
regard of the clearly opposing position expressed by another major shareholder of AB
Panevėžio Pienas, it being AB Pieno Žvaigždės, in respect of actions
pursued by AB Rokiškio Sūris, and the possible challenges in the management of
the acquired entity in view of significant conflict of interests. Therefore, the CC
decided to approve the intended concentration, assessing the purpose of the concentration
effected by AB Rokiškio Sūris as an investment (financial) measure with an
objective to sell all the acquired shares of AB Panevėžio Pienas.
The decision making process also took into consideration the ever
increasing share of AB Rokiškio Sūris in the milk purchase market, and although
expressed in volumes of milk the company was exporting about 70% of its dairy products,
the milk purchase prices were on the steady decline. In principle, AB Rokiškio Sūris,
holding about 40% of the milk purchase market was capable of determining the low milk
purchase prices in the entire milk purchase sector. As opposed to other States, in
Lithuania support to the milk producers was insignificant, also export of dairy products
was not supported at all, and the dairy products output in the country exceeded the
consumption by nearly twice. For that reason, AB Rokiškio Sūris, exporting most
of its output, in the same way as many other exporting milk producers were facing severe
competition in foreign markets. Lithuanian milk producers are on competing terms with
large milk producers from other countries (Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Portugal and the
Netherlands) in which up to 60-90% of all purchased milk is produced.
In December 2003, the CC examined the notification filed on 2
September 2003 by TeliaSonera AB on concentration by acquiring up to 90% shares of UAB
Omnitel through its subsidiary Amber Mobile Teleholding AB. The CC resolved to
authorise the intended concentration under the following terms and obligations:
1. UAB Omnitel is prohibited from effecting reorganisation
through taking over or merging with AB Lietuvos Telekomas or any other undertaking
directly or indirectly controlled by TeliaSonera AB without the prior notification
of CC in the prescribed manner and within the established time limits, and having obtained
an authorisation of the CC to perform such concentration actions.
2. AB Lietuvos Telekomas shall not, unless it obtains a prior
authorisation of the CC, transfer its current operations (customer contracts) related to
the provision of the fixed telecommunications market to UAB Omnitel. This
obligation shall be revoked in case UAB Omnitel, in the manner prescribed by the
laws, is subject to one or more regulatory obligations as an undertaking exercising a
significant influence in the relevant telecommunications market.
3. Seeking to ensure the transparency of operations related to the
provision of telecommunications services via the public fixed and the mobile
telecommunications networks, UAB Omnitel is obligated to maintain separate
accounting of all costs related to the provision of fixed telecommunications services.
This obligation, in view of the segregated accounting of costs related to the access and
the network interconnection must be fulfilled not later than within three months following
the coming into effect of the Resolution of the CC authorising the concentration.
4. TeliaSonera AB is obligated to ensure that AB Lietuvos
Telekomas and UAB Omnitel including all other directly or indirectly controlled
undertakings providing the fixed telecommunications services in the Republic of Lithuania,
acting in accordance with the effective domestic laws abide in their operations with the
non-discrimination clause, in particular, when concluding contracts concerning the network
interconnection and network access.
The decision of the CC was based on the data produced by
telecommunications markets surveys and the liberalisation tendencies inherent to the fixed
telecommunications markets. Since in this particular case of the examined concentration
the joint control over UAB Omnitel exercised jointly by TeliaSonera AB and Motorola
AB was actually being replaced by a unilateral control by TeliaSonera AB, the
concentration was designated as horizontal and vertical concentration in the relevant
telecommunications markets. In the course of the examination of this particular case of
concentration it was established that the principle markets affected by the concentration
in question are the fixed telecommunications services and the mobile telecommunications
services markets. Besides, the data transmission and the Internet as well as related
services markets are rapidly expanding, and, upon the liberalisation of the
telecommunications markets, this trend is expected even to accelerate.
The investigation conducted by the CC concluded that AB Lietuvos
Telekomas holds a dominant position in certain relevant service markets, such as
public fixed telecommunications market, individual fixed telecommunications markets and
the market for the dedicated lines services. AB Lietuvos Telekomas is holding a
significant share in the market for data transmission, provision of the Internet or
related services, while a large share of the same markets is held also by UAB Omnitel.
Furthermore, UAB Omnitel share in the mobile telecommunications market and the
international mobile inter-network services market is also significant. The degree of
concentration would be affected in the relevant telecommunications markets, which could
lead to a creation or strengthening of a dominant position and severe restriction of
competition. Furthermore, TeliaSonera AB, by enhancing its control over UAB
Omnitel would secure a possibility to exercise a complete coordination of actions of AB
Lietuvos Telekomas and UAB Omnitel . For that reason TeliaSonera AB
would enhance its capacity through its economy of scale and the volumes of its investment
into the development of new technologies, integration of the existing and the developed
telecommunications networks, it could rearrange its organisational management structures.
It is credible that in the future both AB Lietuvos Telekomas and UAB Omnitel would
be able to strengthen their positions in the relevant markets.
While passing the decision the CC also made allowance for the fact that
TeliaSonera AB undertook to initiate and encourage AB Lietuvos Telekomas to
consider the issue of a gradual replacement of the NMT-450 technology by a cable network
which would open new opportunities for a more diversified range of telecommunications
services in areas where it is considered expedient in view of consumer needs and economic
substantiation of such upgrading operations.
Actions of public and local authorities restricting competition
The CC examined the complaint lodged by the insurance company UAB
Lietuvos Draudimo Kreditų Draudimas in which the complainant claimed it was not
receiving allocations for partial compensations of actual costs of the insurance of
non-marketable risk of exporters which placed the company to some competitive disadvantage
as compared to that of the competing insurance company UAB Lietuvos Eksporto ir Importo
Draudimas.
The conducted investigation established that UAB Lietuvos Draudimo
Kreditų Draudimas and UAB Lietuvos Eksporto ir Importo Draudimas competing in
the relevant market are placed at different competitive conditions. Such difference in the
competitive conditions stems from the Resolution of the Government to provide for partial
compensation of actual costs of insurance of non-marketable risk of exporter only in
respect of the insurance company UAB Lietuvos Eksporto ir Importo Draudimas. The CC
appealed to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania with a proposal to amend the
procedure established by the Government and thus abolish privileges to UAB Lietuvos
Eksporto ir Importo Draudimas where the company is able to engage in the insurance of
non-marketable risks and benefit from partial compensation of insurance premiums from
public funds.
The CC conducted with a view to assessing the actions of the
Vilnius Municipality when the authority refused the permit to UAB United Media to
set up new advertising stands.
During the investigation it was established that UAB United Media
repeatedly applied to the Urban Development Department of the Vilnius Municipality and
submitted document packages seeking to obtain permits by the Vilnius Municipality to set
up new sites for outside advertising stands. The company, however, was notified that the
issuance of permits for setting up of outdoor ads was suspended until the new decree of
the Municipality on outdoor advertising is passed. In the meantime other companies
operating in the same market as UAB United Media encountered no restrictions in
respect of their actions and could pursue in setting up new outdoor ads. The Vilnius
Municipality informed that companies in the city of Vilnius were setting up outdoor stands
on buildings and structures owned or managed by the Vilnius Municipality on the basis of
previously concluded agreements and in locations allocated for this purpose specified by
such agreements.
Even before the conclusion of the investigation conducted by the CC the
Vilnius Municipality passed a decision to obligate the Urban Development Department to
issue permits for setting up of new advertising stands.
The investigation carried out by the CC sought to establish the
compliance of Order No. 155 of 15 April 1999 of the Minister of Agriculture On
mandatory quality requirements for vegetable oil for human consumption with provisions
of Art. 4 of the LC. The Order established standard quality requirements for all vegetable
oils used for human consumption, which, in the opinion of the applicant UAB Palnik
is inherent to oils produced by cold compression. In Lithuania, only AB Obelių aliejus
employs cold compression to produce rape oil. Most of the imported oil is produced by
method of hot compression, therefore, in the opinion of the applicant the said Order of
the Ministry of Agriculture creates preferential terms for AB Obelių aliejus and
is discriminatory in respect of importers of oil.
The investigation established that the Order being challenged did not
create any exclusive terms in respect of AB Obelių aliejus and was not
discriminatory in respect of importers of vegetable oil.
As early as 2002, the State Food and Veterinary Agency tested 100
samples of imported oil produced from different raw materials both by cold and hot
compression methodology and established that 77 samples complied with the quality
requirements. The expert examination of legal acts regulating the mandatory quality
requirements applicable to vegetable oil for human consumption established that by setting
forth the quality requirements the Minister of Agriculture was acting in accordance with
the provisions of the Law on Food of the Republic of Lithuania. The investigation was
discontinued. The investigation, however, prompted the Ministry of Agriculture to specify
the mandatory quality requirements applicable to vegetable oil for human consumption.
Market research
For the purpose of fulfilment of the Action plan approved by Resolution
No. 702 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, the CC conducted an investigation
seeking to establish the position of major trade networks in the retail trade market. The
objective of the investigation was to determine the share held by major trade networks in
the turnover of retail trade market of individual towns and regions, and assess the
position of such companies in the retail trade markets. The analysis disclosed that
trading in food products represented the largest share of the activity of major trade
networks. While in 2002, the gross retail turnover in goods of the 5 trading networks
accounted for 47% of retail turnover in goods of undertakings the main area of activity
whereof is retail trade, in the food products group the trade networks market share was
72.7%. The turnover of UAB VP Market in the food product group accounted for 81% of
the companys retail turnover in goods, while that of IKI was 86%, Rimi
Lietuva - 80%, Norfos Mažmena - 85%, and Aibė network - almost 80%.
The findings of the said investigation were made use of by the Ministry
of Economy of the Republic of Lithuania for the purpose of drawing up its conclusions on
the status in the Lithuanian retail trade markets.
Another research had an objective to assess the market of vocational
training of the unemployed persons and the employees notified of the termination of their
employment agreements. Such vocational training activities are funded form the Employment
fund resources and other sources of funding.
Having regard to the findings of the said market research and seeking
to ensure the publicity and transparency of selection of vocational train gin
institutions, as well as the compliance of operations of such institutions with the
provisions of the Law on Public Procurement and the principles of fair competition, the CC
submitted proposals to the Ministry of Social Security and Labour and the Public
Procurement Service under the Government of the Republic of Lithuania.
2. Monitoring of State aid to undertakings
It is quite justified to maintain that the successful completion of
the negotiations between Lithuania and the EU concerning the Competition Chapter including
State aid issues is in essence a proof that the principal requirements of acquis
concerning State aid were transposed into the national law. Therefore the accounting
period was mainly the time for the revision and harmonization of the said requirements
already contained in the relevant Lithuanian legislation. On 16 January 2003 seeking
harmonisation between the EU and the national law the CC repealed the previously approved
Rules on State aid to synthetic fibre industry.
Having regard to the provisions of the European Commission directive
80/723/EEC "On the transparency of financial relations between Member States and
public undertakings (and the subsequent supplements thereto) and acting as a
coordinating authority in the area of State aid, the CC, in conjunction with the Ministers
of Finance, Economy and Transport defined the stages for the implementation of the
directive in Lithuania and outlined the relevant implementing regulations. In May 2003,
the CC drew up the draft of the Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania
On the approval of the decision of the EU and the Republic of Lithuania Association
Committee on the regional aid map to be used as a basis for the assessment of State aid
granted in Lithuania.
For the purpose of exercising its supervisory authority in the area
of State aid during the period under review the CC devoted considerable attention to the
assessment of intended State aid to enterprises. The report on the progress of Lithuania
in the implementation of State aid provisions of Article 64 of the Treaty establishing the
EU which was presented to the meeting of the EU-Lithuanian sub-committee No.2 on internal
market issues held on 22 May 2003 described in detail the progress attained by Lithuania
in the area during the accounting period.
During the period under review the CC assessed 48 cases of State aid
granting including legal acts drafted by various public authorities, as well as
notifications on State aid. In certain cases the CC passed appropriate decisions, it also,
on numerous occasions, submitted its proposals and comments. During the period concerned,
acting in accordance with the procedure for the monitoring of the provision of State aid
State aid providers submitted 16 notifications on intended State aid. In three cases the
CC approved the State aid unconditionally, while on two occasions the intended State aid
was approved subject to certain conditions. It was only in a single case that the
authorisation of the intended State aid was refused. The CC initiated the assessment of
one case of State aid, which is to be completed by the time Lithuania accesses the EU. In
certain other cases it was concluded that the State aid notification provided for State
aid measures, which do not constitute State aid, or that the notified aid was actually de
minimis aid which is not subject to the authorisation by the CC. The Table below
summarizes the data on the assessed State aid projects during the year 2003.
| Notifications on State aid received and projects assesses during 2003: | 48 |
| of which: | |
| Decisions passed by the CC: | 7 |
| of which: | |
| State aid authorised | 3 |
| State aid authorised subject to certain conditions | 2 |
| Authorisation of State aid refused | 1 |
| Investigation by the CC is in progress during 2004 | 1 |
| Other legal acts examined in respect of which the CC submitted comments and proposals, also other inquiries by State aid providers and recipients, other cases examined | 41 |
According to the notifications submitted in 2003, the most frequent
type of intended aid was aid to the restructuring of enterprises and regional development
by promotion of investment and creation of new jobs. Cases of State aid assessed by the CC
are further discussed in detail.
On 12 February 2003, the CC approved the State aid according to the
notification on State aid filed by the Klaipėda Region State Tax Inspectorate. The
purpose of the State aid - regional aid for promotion of investment and creation of new
jobs. According to the information supplied by the State aid provider, AB Laivitė
intends to allocate the investment for the development of the enterprises and take over of
new technologies. As indicated by the State aid provider, the State aid will favourably
affect the development of Klaipėda and the entire region of Western Lithuania. In the
course of 2003-2005 investments by AB Laivitė will lead to the creation of 325
jobs.
While assessing the intended State aid account was taken of the fact
that the intensity of the aid granted to the company under the said project will amount to
2%, which is within the permissible intensity limits. In addition, the State aid recipient
- AB Laivitė ensured the viability of the investment project by financing over 25%
of the entire investment project costs.
The Resolution of the CC concerning the approval of the State aid to
the enterprise indicates that the State aid provider - Klaipėda County State Tax
Inspectorate must ensure that the newly created jobs and investments into AB Laivitė
will be maintained at least five years following the implementation of the investment
project. The State aid provider is also obligated to monitor the course of the
implementation of the investment project according to the provided investment schedule.
On 15 July 2003, the CC approved State aid to UAB Marijampolės
Statyba in accordance with the consolidated notification on State aid filed by the
Marijampolė Region State Tax Inspectorate. On 3 January 2003, Kaunas County Court
initiated the restructuring proceedings in respect of the company. Financial measures in
respect of the company under the restructuring were designed to facilitate the company to
discharge its liabilities to Marijampole Region State Tax Inspectorate and the
Marijampolė division of the State Social Insurance Fund. The time limits for the
discharge of the liabilities to the institutions concerned will be extended for the period
of restructuring of the enterprise, besides the institutions will waive part of tax
liabilities.
The conducted investigation established that upon the implementation of
the measures stipulated by the restructuring plan which cover the restructuring of the
companys financial liabilities and the forthcoming investment would create realistic
assumptions for the restoration of the long-term viability of the company. The measures
envisaged for the financing of the restructuring measures is proportional to the
restructuring costs, and contribution of owners is deemed significant.
On 28 February 2003, the CC received the notification of the Board
of the State Social Insurance Fund on State aid to UAB Panevėžio Aurida. State
support measure involving the exemption of the aided enterprise from late interest is
considered to constitute State aid. The purpose of the State aid in question, as provided
in the notification submitted by the State aid provider, is regional development by
promotion of investment and creation of new jobs.
As indicated in the material provided, UAB Panevėžio Aurida
through the implementation of the investment project intends to create 74 new jobs in
Panevėžys town, which will be beneficial for the development of the region. The
intensity of the aid provided to UAB Panevėžio Aurida would be maintained within
the permissible limits, as set forth by Art. 6 and 11 of the Law on Monitoring of State
Aid to Undertakings, and the Rules on State Aid for Regional Development approved by
the CC.
Resolution of the CC of 3 September 2003 approved the State aid to UAB
Panevėžio Aurida, however, subjecting it to certain conditions. One of the
conditions provided that the jobs in the enterprise must be created not later than within
3 years after the implementation of the project and must be related to the activity
benefiting from the investment. Another condition obligated the Board of the State Social
Insurance Fund to ensure that the State aid recipient maintain the jobs and the investment
for a period not shorter than 5 years, and will monitor the course of the implementation
of the investment project in accordance with the submitted investment schedule.
On 17 July 2003, the institution started the assessment of the
State aid notified by the Board of the Social insurance Fund. The notified aid was
intended to AB Statybos Apdailos Mašinos, a company suffering from economic
difficulties. According to the provisions of the Law on Monitoring of State Aid to
Undertakings and The Rules on State Aid for the rescue and restructuring of
enterprises approved by the CC Resolution No. 55 of 10 May 2001, State aid may be
authorised provided the enterprises restructuring plan is developed and submitted, and
other provisions of the said legal acts are complied with.
The conducted investigation concluded that the plan for restructuring
of AB Statybos Apdailos Mašinos did not contain a detailed analysis of the
financial and economic standing of the enterprise, neither it provided a marketing and
production development plan, besides, the restructuring plan did not provide for any
measures aiming at restructuring of the management structure and risk avoidance. The State
aid provider failed to provide information on forecasts on changes in demand, prices and
production capacities within the next five years in the EU and Lithuania or a thorough
market survey. The State aid provider also failed to provide sufficient evidence that the
implementation of the restructuring plan is feasible and that State aid will ensure a
long-term viability and solvency of the company, within the meaning of item 1 of par. 2 of
Art. 9 of the Law on Monitoring of State Aid to Undertakings. Furthermore, no information
was provided on the costs of restructuring of AB Statybos Apdailos Mašinos, or the
sources of such funding and the contribution of the beneficiary. No information was
submitted as to the implementation by the company of Resolution of the Government of the
Republic of Lithuania of 10 October 2000 which provided for restructuring of the capital
of the company by public funds without initiating the bankruptcy proceedings, Having
considered all the above considerations the CC refused the authorisation of State aid to AB
Statybos Apdailos Mašinos by passing to that effect its Resolution on 11 September
2003.
Meeting of the CC of 9 October 2003 assessed the notification of the
Ministry of Finance on State aid to the Lithuanian-Russian UAB Gargždų Mida
undergoing restructuring. The material provided by the Ministry of Finance indicated that
on 30 May 2003 the Klaipėda County Court initiated restructuring proceedings in respect
of the Lithuanian-Russian UAB Gargždų Mida. The notification indicates that the
State aid will be provided through the implementation of financial measures and
restructuring of the companys operations. The plan of the restructuring of the company
suggested that the implementation of the investment project is an underlying condition for
the successful restructuring of the company. Substantial investments into share capital of
the company as well as loans extended by Technonikol were indicated as the source
of funding of the program in question. The company is planning to increase the production
and marketing volumes, and introduce some cost-cutting measures. Within the restructuring
period substantial efforts will be dedicated to increase the sales in the CIS markets.
Upon the implementation of the plan, the companys profitability, liquidity, capital
return and other financial indicators (ratios) would be positive. The thorough examination
of the relevant material allowed a conclusion that implementation of the measures targeted
at the restructuring of the companys operations will create realistic condition for the
restoration of the long-term viability of the company, while the contribution of owners,
accounting for 60% of the restructuring costs is deemed significant. Having assessed the
restructuring plan and the material provided in the notification of the Ministry of
Finance the CC decided to authorise the State aid to the Lithuanian-Russian UAB
Gargždų Mida.
The examination of the notification filed by the Ministry of Finance on
State aid to Šiauliai enterprise of the Lithuanian Association of the Blind and Visually
Handicapped People (further - Šiauliai enterprise of LASS) was started in October 2003.
In November 2002, the main creditors of the Šiauliai enterprise approved the
restructuring of the enterprise and the guidelines of the enterprises restructuring
plan. On 26 November 2002, Šiauliai County court initiated restructuring proceedings in
respect of the enterprise. The Ministry of Finance and the Board of the State Social
Insurance Fund, acting in accordance with the Law on Restructuring of Enterprises of the
Republic of Lithuania, had provided for financial measures to be applied to Šiauliai
enterprise of LASS. It was established that the support measures stipulated in the
notification on State aid comply with the criteria of State aid within the meaning of the
Law on Monitoring of State Aid to Undertakings, and are considered to constitute State
aid.
The Lithuanian Association of the Blind and Visually Handicapped People
with an objective to address the social and employment issues in relation to the blind and
the visually handicapped persons established the Šiauliai enterprise of LASS. The
enterprise engaged 53 persons suffering from disability. Judging from the information
provided in the State aid notification and the additionally obtained information the
Šiauliai enterprise of LASS is an enterprise in difficulty. The examination of the
notification allowed a conclusion that the plan drafted by the Šiauliai enterprise of
LASS provides for the rescheduling of the debts of the enterprise and measures aimed at
the restructuring of its operations. While assessing the notified aid the CC took account
of the fact that the main purpose of economic activities of the Šiauliai enterprise LASS
is not profit seeking, but implementation of social programs designed to handle the
problems of unemployment among the blind and the visually handicapped people. In this
particular case the State aid recipient was providing for all measures it is capable of
implementing, and the State aid in this case will not exceed additional costs incurred due
to employing of handicapped persons. Having considered all the arguments presented by the
State aid provider the CC decided to authorise the State aid to the Šiauliai enterprise
of LASS.
While implementing its supervisory authority as empowered by the
Law on Monitoring of State Aid to Undertakings the CC examined the Report on State support
to undertakings in 2001 submitted by the Board of the State Social Insurance Fund. The CC
established that State support granted to undertakings in accordance with Art. 36 and 38
of the Law on State Social Insurance of the Republic of Lithuania, and items 21, 23 and 25
of the Rules on the formation and execution of the budget of the State Social Insurance
Fund may be considered as constituting State aid. Therefore the CC initiated the
assessment of the said measures, which is still in progress during the year 2004.
Also, in the period being reviewed the CC started the assessment of
intended State aid to AB Vingriai and the producer of decorative ceramics AB
Jiesia notified by the Ministry of Finance.
During the year 2003, the CC also carried out the assessment of several
notifications on State aid to individual enterprises submitted by Kaunas County State tax
Inspectorate. The enterprises in respect of which aid was intended were medium-sized,
independent enterprises within the meaning of par. 14 of Art. 2 of the Law on Monitoring
of State Aid to Undertakings. Local tax administrators are authorised to provide State aid
to enterprises pursuant to the requirements of the provision of State aid to small and
medium-sized enterprises in the form of tax incentives approved by Resolution No. 113 of
31 October 2002 of the CC of the Republic of Lithuania.
The CC allocated substantial efforts for the assessment of draft legal
acts submitted for expert examination by Ministries of Finance, Economy, Justice, Foreign
Affairs, Transport, Education and Science, and Social Security and Labour. Specialists of
the CC examined 29 draft legal acts, which were later on accordingly amended and
supplemented, and presented their views and comments on 5 draft legal acts.
The CC examined the draft of the Resolution of the Government of the
Republic of Lithuania On the approval of the plan for rehabilitation of public company Alytaus
Tekstilė; draft Resolution of the Government On the approval of draft contracts
with the public company of the Russian Federation Yukos Oil Corporation, the
limited liability company of the Netherlands Yukos Finance B.V. and the public
company Mažeikių nafta and granting of relevant authorisations; the draft Law
on the amendment and supplement of Articles 3, 8, 15, 16 and 27 of the Law on the
Fundamentals of Kaunas Free Economic Zones of the Republic of Lithuania; and the draft Law
on the rehabilitation of operations of the public company Alytaus Tekstilė, submitted
by the Ministry of Economy. Experts of the Competition Council presented their expert
comments to these legal acts.
The Competition Council examined the draft Resolution of the Government
of the Republic of Lithuania On the approval of the supplement to the rules on
formation and execution of the State social insurance fund budget prepared by the
Ministry of Social Security and Labour, and the draft Resolution of the Government On
the approval of the plan of measures to ensure the guaranteed level of reception of
programs of the National Lithuanian radio and television in the territory in Lithuania
prepared by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority under the Government of the
Republic of Lithuania.
During the year 2003, officials of the CC participated in the meetings
hosted by the Ministry of Economy, the agenda whereof included the analysis and assessment
of problems faced by industry and business, also issues related to the free economic
zones. The CC expressed its views on State aid to the promotion and development of the
small and medium-sized business as provided in the National development plan of the
Strategic Planning Document. On a regular basis, the CC was submitting proposals
concerning intended State to the State Loan Commission.
For the CC enforcement of the Law on Monitoring of State Aid to
Undertakings has been an important tool in its pursuit to ensure the monitoring and
transparency of the provided State aid. Throughout the year 2003 the CC continued to
compile and systemize the State aid Register, currently containing the data of Sate aid
granted to Lithuanian undertakings during 1996-2002.
The data accumulated in the State Aid Register was used as an
information source in drafting the annual report for the European Commission. According to
the data currently available in 2002 the State aid granted in Lithuania totals LTL 258,8m
(EUR 74.96m).
In 2002, the national State aid accounted for 0.51% of the national GDP
(at current prices), i.e. in average LTL 184.09 per one working person. In 2002, the GDP
of Lithuania grew by 6.8% (at current prices) as compared to the level of 2001, given the
decline in the level of inflation from 2.0% in 2001 to a deflation of 1.0% in 2002. The
data presented in the Tables of the Annex clearly show that provision of State aid during
1996-2002 was diminishing. In 1996 the granted State aid amounted to LTL 904.42m, the
volumes further decreasing to amount to LTL 258.8m in 2002. Accordingly, the indicator of
national State aid per one working person fell from LTL 545.04 in 1996 to LTL 184.09 in
2002.
The development of State aid to the manufacturing industry and services
during the period referred to displayed a rather fluctuating trend. In 2002, State aid to
the manufacturing industry and services constituted the largest part of the total national
State aid, accounting for as much as 58.74%. In 2002, the main objectives sought while
providing the State aid in the areas concerned were the promotion of research and
development, innovations, trade, rescue and restructuring of enterprises, ship-building
and regional development. Aid for the rescue and restructuring of enterprises accounted
for as much as 91.35% of the total aid to the manufacturing industry and services. The
data on the breakdown of the State aid by main sectors are presented in the Annex to this
Report.
3. Enforcement of the Law on Advertising
During 2003, the CC examined 13 cases related to the use of misleading
and comparative advertising. Infringements of the Law on Advertising were established in 8
cases, which led to the infringing undertakings being obligated to cease the use of the
advertising, in 2 more severe cases the undertakings were subjected to pecuniary
sanctions. Two investigations were discontinued on the basis that the undertakings
voluntarily ceased the infringing activities, 3 investigations are still in progress. In
certain cases due to the small significance of the infringements sanctions were limited to
preventive measures where four undertakings were warned in writing to cease the use of
misleading advertising.
The Lithuanian-American UAB Bennet Distributors filed a
petition claiming that the alcohol cocktail Dozė produced by AB Stumbras,
contrary to what is claimed does not contain the alcoholic drink Campari. Newspaper
ads and the label on the drink read Campari+orange. The specialists of the CC
examined the advertisements carefully and concluded that the mode of presentation of the
ads was suggestive to the consumer of the drink containing the drink Campari. The
substance used for the production of the cocktail is the rectified ethyl alcohol, while
adding Campari and the aromatic substances derives the flavour. For the advertising
of the cocktail Dozė AB Stumbras used the well known trade mark of
Campari for the aromatic substance Campari 01332 Campari. AB Stumbras
was obligated to cease the use of the misleading advertisement; furthermore, it was warned
of the possibility to be subjected to fines where it fails to cease or decides to renew
the use of such misleading advertising.
During June-July 2003 ads of the mobile telecommunications company UAB
Tele2 placed in the press, outdoor advertising structures and the companys flyers
promoted the Joker service by announcing Become a user of Joker by July 20,
and throughout July, August and September our special gift to you is free calls for LTL 20
to any network. The advertising text, however, contained no indication that such
rebates were available only to new subscribers of UAB Tele2.
The CC started the investigation on its own initiative, which lead to
the conclusion that in its ad the company failed to present exhaustive information; in
other words, part of the information necessary to avoid the misleading of the consumers
was missed. Since the information, which was missed in the advertising text, could
influence the economic decision of the consumers choice to become a user of
Joker, the advertising was recognised as misleading.
Investigation carried out on the initiative of the CC aimed at the
establishing whether or not the advertising of the body weight regulating preparation
Slim Caps by UAB Biogloba constituted an infringement of Art. 5 of the Law on
Advertising. Since the provider of advertising UAB Biogloba failed to produce
grounded evidence of the capability of the preparation Slim caps to regulate the
body weight in kilograms as indicated in the advertisement in question, the advertising
was recognised as misleading. In this particular case the CC, referring to the amendments
of the Law on Advertising adopted in late 2002 substantially modifying the procedure for
economic sanctioning, imposed upon UAB Biogloba a fine of LTL 5,000 for the use of
misleading advertisements.
The Lithuanian branch of the company providing banking services Nordea
Bank Finland PLC was adverting the cash withdrawal at ATMs of Vilniaus bankas
and branches of the bank as follows: From now on for holders of Maestro and EC/MC
credit payment cards of Nordea Bank Lietuva cash withdrawal at Vilniaus bankas
ATMs for only LTL 1.00, and for our special clients withdrawal at no charge. A client
of the bank, holder of an EC/MC payment card with interest-free credit and enjoying a
special clients status tried to avail himself of the terms advertised by the bank, and
found out that cash withdrawal at Vilniaus bankas ATMs was charged at the rate of
2.5% of the amount withdrawn.
The investigators found out that the advertising by the Lithuanian
branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC did not contained any indication that the terms
for cash withdrawal advertised were available only for holders of Maestro and EC/MC
Standard payment cards (the bank was issuing EC/MC cards of three types). The information
provided by the bank was incomplete as missing part of the information necessary to avoid
the misleading of the clients. The advertising was thus recognised as misleading, the bank
was obligated to cease the use of the advertising in question and notify all customers in
writing of the terms of cash withdrawal available to special clients.
The CC initiated the investigation of the advertising used by the
public undertaking Vėjo Sala, when the undertaking in question was distributing
tickets to the concert of an American singer Marilyn Manson. The objective of the
investigation was to establish whether or not the activities of the undertaking were in
compliance with provisions of Art. 5 of the Law on Advertising. Vėjo Sala, as the
organizer of the concert in Vilnius, was promoting the concert by advertising of the
so-called fan zone, in which the audience will be provided best seats and more
favourable terms. During the concert, however, the promoted fan zone simply did not
exist. Those who had purchased tickets for LTL 80 at the concert were provided exactly the
same conditions as those holding less expensive tickets. The misleading advertising
incurred damage to each holder of a fan-zone ticket was valued at LTL 20-50, since
the price for regular tickets was LTL 30-60. Having assessed the damage incurred to the
consumers the CC subjected the public undertaking Vėjo Sala to a fine of LTL 8,000
for the use of misleading advertising.
UAB Omnitel, the mobile telecommunications services provider was
promoting its pre-paid mobile communications service Ekstra, which was heavily
advertised on TV and radio channels. The advertising of Ekstra service could
mislead potential users of the service, since the advertising statement, which read
Throughout the summer for all talking for longer than a minute, - Ekstra - for 7
cents only, day and night, and for SMS messages. An important piece of information that
the availability of such tariffs was made conditional upon certain additional factors was
omitted. This could have determined a potential clients choice of the mobile
telecommunications service provider, and, on that basis, the advertising was recognised
misleading. For the first time ever in the practice of the Competition Council the
appropriate warning was issued not to the provider of the advertising, but to the producer
of the advertisement message UAB Brand Sellers DDB Vilnius, through whose fault the
misleading advertising was published.
Another investigation concerned the compliance of the advertising by AB
Lietuvos Telekomas with Art. 5 of the Law on Advertising. The investigation was
prompted by a compliant received from a subscriber of AB Lietuvos Telekomas. The
subscriber maintained that from the information provided in the advertising leaflet she
understood that the call forwarding offered was provided at no charge, and availed herself
of the services while being away from home for a longer time. However, the bill for the
telecommunications services showed that the calls forwarded from her telephone number to
another telephone number were charged at the same rates as local calls.
The investigation examined the text of the advertising presented in the
leaflet which read Free services
Call forwarding. It turned out that although the
statement cannot be considered as directly misleading users of such services, it
nevertheless missed certain explanations that the user of the service will be charged at
rates established by AB Lietuvos Telekomas subject to the location of the
telephone. This advertising was recognised misleading on the basis that it omitted an
important part of the information necessary, in view of other information presented in the
same ad, in order to avoid misleading of the consumer.
The National Association of drink producers submitted a request to
examine whether or not the advertising disseminated by UAB Baltijos Mineralinių
Vandenų Kompanija on television and bottles of the lemonade Gaja was capable of
misleading consumers and be contradicting to Art. 5 of the Law on Advertising. The
advertisement read: The only in Lithuania soft drink with sugar made of natural mineral
water TICHĖ. Contains no sweeteners not recommended for human health . The
investigation concluded that the advertisement of the lemonade Gaja containing a
statement Contains no sweeteners not recommended for human health is capable of
misleading consumers, because the mode of presentation of the advertising could lead to
consumers understanding that all sweeteners are harmful for human health. However,
according to the hygiene standards approved in Lithuania certain sweeteners, such as food
supplements are permitted in the production of aromatised drinks. On that basis, the
advertisement was recognised as misleading. The company was obligated within 15 days to
cease use of the advertisement and warned that in case it fails to act upon the obligation
or renews the use of the advertisement, it will be subject to fines set forth in the Law
on Advertising.
4. Legal practice
During the year 2003, the courts of the Republic of Lithuania
investigated 11 cases related to the decisions passed by the CC. At the end of the year
the legal proceedings in respect of one case were still in progress. During the period
under review courts having passed the final rulings closed 9 cases. In all those cases the
appeals were dismissed and resolutions of the CC were upheld. On a single occasion the
appeals of the claimants were partly upheld.
For the first time in the practice of litigation concerning the
resolution passed by the CC, an inquiry was lodged to the Constitutional Court of the
Republic of Lithuania. The courts awaited conclusions of the Constitutional Court so that
they could complete their proceeding. The litigation proceedings lasted for nearly three
years, but the conclusions announced were of considerable
significance both for the legal expertise of the CC and its prestige, as they have proved
that the competition authority managed to accurately and very professionally assess the
restricting practices disclosed in the course of the investigation.
Resolution No. 11/b of 10 July 2000 of the CC On the infringement of
item 3 of par. 1 of Art. 9 of the LC by AB Mažeikių Nafta established that the
dominant undertaking AB Mažeikių Nafta was abusing its dominant position by
applying dissimilar (discriminating) rebates and other purchase conditions to equivalent
agreements with other purchasers, thus infringing item 3 of par. 1 of Art. 9 of the LC.
The Vilnius District Administrative Court was examining the appeal lodged by AB
Mažeikių Nafta, by its decision of 18 June 2001 suspended the proceedings and
applied to the Constitution Court of the Republic of Lithuania with a request to decide
whether or not the provision of par. 4 of Art. 3 of the Law on the Reorganisation of
Public Companies Būtingės Nafta, Mažeikių Nafta and Naftotiekis passed on 29
September 1998 was in compliance with the principles of the just civil society and
law-governed State enshrined in the Preamble and provisions of pars. 1 and 2 of Art. 5 and
pars. 3, 4 and 5 of Art. 46 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania.
On 17 March 2003, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of
Lithuania, by its resolution, established that regulation as stipulated by par. 4 of Art.
3 of the Law on the Reorganisation of Public Companies Būtingės Nafta, Mažeikių
Nafta and Naftotiekis creates a legal situation where the public and municipal
authorities are not in position to place even those demands which they are obligated to
place in fulfilling the functions assigned to them by the Constitution and the law, and
recognised that provisions of par. 4 of Art. 3 of the Law on the Reorganisation of Public
Companies Būtingės Nafta, Mažeikių Nafta and Naftotiekis which stipulates that
after the strategic investor acquires the shares under item 1 of par. 1 of this Article
public and municipal authorities will not be entitled to place any demands to the public
companies AB Mažeikių Nafta and its subsidiaries concerning the actions or
omissions of AB Mažeikių Nafta or its subsidiaries, or other events that have
taken place prior to the acquisitions of the shares by the strategic investor,
contradicts parts 3, 4 and 5 of Art. 46 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania,
the principles of constitutional law-governed State and to the extent which establishes
that additional demands referred to in the provisions shall also not be placed by
municipal authorities, contradicts part 2 of Art. 120 and Art. 122 of the Constitution of
the Republic of Lithuania.
The Vilnius District Administrative Court renewed the proceedings and
by its decision of 23 April 2003 dismissed the appeal as ungrounded. The Supreme
Administrative Court of Lithuania dismissed the appeal by its decision of 11 July 2003 and
resolved that the CC, by its resolution No. 11/b of 10 July 2000, correctly defined the
relevant market and the dominance held by AB Mažeikių Nafta therein, justifiably
acknowledged the terms applied by AB Mažeikių Nafta in equivalent agreements with
undertakings as discriminatory and passed a legitimate and duly grounded decision.
Likewise, court rulings passed in other cases will have a tremendous
importance to the strengthening of the legal capacity of the CC and its ability to draw up
qualified legal conclusions. The experience acquired through the assessment by courts of
the quality of the investigations carried out by specialists of the CC, helps the CC
specialists enhance their professionalism and effectiveness.
Another Resolution appealed to court was Resolution No. 2S-9 of 26 June
2003 of the CC Concerning the compliance of actions of AB Lietuvos Telekomas with
the requirements of Art. 5 of the Law on Advertising. The CC established that the
advertisement published in the leaflet Linija plius which read Free service
Call forwarding is incomplete and due to its misleading character could have determined
the economic behaviour of consumers in their selection of the service provider, and
recognised the said advertisement as misleading. Having examined the appeal of AB
Lietuvos Telekomas the Vilnius District Administrative Court, in its ruling of 7
November 2003, resolved that the decision of the CC to recognise the advertisement of AB
Lietuvos Telekomas as misleading was duly grounded.
On 18 July 2003, the CC in writing responsded to UAB Žalmargės
Pienas by presenting its view concerning inquiries of the enterprise in its letter of
30 June 2003, and proposed that concerning the problems encountered by the enterprise it
appeals to the Ministry of Agriculture. UAB Žalmargės Pienas appealed the letter
of 18 July 2003 of the CC to the Vilnius District Administrative Court requiring to
recognise that actions of the CC whereby it responded by the letter of 18 July 2003 are
unlawful, and obligate the CC to pass a resolution to initiate an investigation concerning
the facts laid down in the letter of 30 June 2003 of UAB Žalmargės Pienas, or to
refuse to initiate the investigation.
The Vilnius District Administrative Court, by its decision of 8
December 2003, dismissed the appeal by resolving that the decision concerning the
requirement laid down in the letter of the applicant to obligate the Ministry of
Agriculture to include UAB Žalmargės Pienas into Annex 1 of The Rules on the
provision of support to milk processing enterprises at maintaining milk purchase price
approved by Order No. 3D-236 of 16 June 2003 of the Minister of Agriculture was not within
the remit of the CC, which, therefore, did not infringe any legal acts or the rights of
the applicant and was under no obligation to pass a decision set forth in Art. 25 of the
LC.
Resolution No. 80 of 18 July 2001 of the CC Concerning the
anti-dumping duty imposed upon Portland cement of Belarusian, Russian and Ukrainian
production and imported into Lithuania imposed an anti-dumping duty upon Portland
cement produced in the Ukraine and imported into the customs territory of Lithuania.
On 29 November 2001, the Chief Administrative Disputes Commission
(VAGK), having examined the appeal of AB Specializuota Komplektavimo Valdyba
concerning the annulment of Resolution No. 80 of 18 July 2001 of the CC, decided to
recognise the part of the Resolution related to the Ukraine as unlawful and obligate the
CC to eliminate the infringements established by the decision of VAGK. The CC appealed to
the Vilnius District Administrative Court with a request to invalidate the decision of the
VAGK. On 4 April 2002 the Vilnius District Administrative Court upheld the appeal of the
CC.
Decision of 17 March 2003 of the Supreme Administrative Court of
Lithuania dismissed the appeal filed by AB Specializuota Komplektavimo Valdyba .
The Court resolved that the CC had justly, without circumventing the requirements of the
Law on Anti-Dumping and other legal acts, established the fact of dumping and passed a
legitimate and duly grounded decision.
By its Resolution No. 110 of 10 October 2002 On the refusal to start
investigation concerning possible restrictive actions of AB Kalnapilis, AB Ragutis and
AB Kauno Alus by bottling and marking the beer Ledo the CC refused to start the
investigation of restrictive practices. The CC motivated its decision by pointing out that
the applicant AB Gubernija did not provide any evidence that restrictive practices
could have damaged the interests of a number of undertakings or consumers.
The decision of 1 April 2003 of the Supreme Administrative Court of
Lithuania dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of the Vilnius District
Administrative Court that the CC, acting in accordance with par. 4 of Art. 17 of the LC
justifiably refused to start the investigation of possibly restrictive actions by AB
Kalnapilis, AB Ragutis and AB Kauno Alus .
By its Resolution No. 10/b of 31 October 2002 On the compliance of
actions of UAB Novaturas in advertising the recreation terms in the hotel Pirates
Beach Club with the requirements of Art. 5 of the Law on Advertising the CC
recognised that advertisement published in the leaflet Atostogos 2002 of UAB
Novaturas describing the terms of the use of the safe-box and the information about
the bar on the beach as misleading advertisement. The Vilnius District Administrative
Court partly upheld the appeal lodged by G.Balnis, whereby the applicant requested to
invalidate the said resolution of the CC, refer the case for additional investigation and
obligated the CC to carry out additional investigation and consideration of the case.
The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, by its decision of 24
April 2003, upheld the appeal of the CC by resolving that the CC, acting on the appeal
filed by the appellant, carried out a an exhaustive investigation, correctly assessed the
evidence and applied the legal forms, and the Vilnius
District Administrative Court had no legal basis to obligate the CC to perform additional
investigation and place the issue for additional consideration.
Resolution No. 2/b of 21 February 2002 of the CC On the
compliance of actions of AB Lietuvos Telekomas with requirements of item 2 of Art.
9 of the LC established that AB Lietuvos Telekomas had blocked the ISDN flow and
telephone lines leased by UAB Interprova thus preventing UAB Interprova from
providing the Internet telephony services, and squeezing the company out if the Internet
telephony services market. Similarly, AB Lietuvos Telekomas blocked access to the
lines in respect of another 35 companies.
Decision of 11 June 2003 of the Supreme Administrative Court of
Lithuania dismissed the appeal lodged by AB Lietuvos Telekomas. The Court ruled
that decision of the CC to asses the actions of AB Lietuvos Telekomas whereby it
blocked the ISDN flow and telephone lines leased by UAB Interprova and another 35
companies as limitation of expansion of the Internet telephony services and market
monopolisation was well grounded, and that the CC rightfully qualified the actions as
constituting an infringement of par. 2 of Art. 9 of the LC.
Resolution No. 78 of 9 July 2002 of the CC On the compliance of item
1.2.3 of Decree No. 152V of 31 January 2002 of the Board of the Vilnius Municipality with
the requirements of Art. 4 of the LC established that by item 1.2.3 of Decree No. 152V
of 31 January 2002 the Board of Vilnius Municipality granted privilege to the district
heating operator to provide heat to premises at Žvejų str. 9, thus discriminating the
provider of heat from the alternative heat source, the gas. This decision brought about
differences in the condition of competition for competing undertakings operating in the
market for heat energy sources. The CC concluded that item 1.2.3 of Decree No. 152V of 31
January 2002 of the Board of Vilnius Municipality constituted an infringement of the
requirements of Art. 4 of the LC.
Upon renewal of the proceedings, the decision of 18 July 2003 of the
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, established, inter allia that the CC had
correctly interpreted the contents of the exemption set forth in Art. 4 of the LC, and the
Board of Vilnius Municipality, by adopting item 1.2.3 of Decree No. 152V of 31 January
2002, implemented powers authorised to it in violation of the prohibition established in
Art. 4 of the LC. The appeals, on that basis, were dismissed.
Resolution No. 2S-6 of 27 March 2003 of the CC Concerning the
compliance of actions of UAB Baltijos Mineralinių Vandenų Kompanija with the
requirements of Art. 5 of the Law on Advertising recognised the advertisement published
by UAB Baltijos Mineralinių Vandenų Kompanija whereby it claimed contains no
sweeteners not recommended for human health as misleading advertising.
On 23 October 2003, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania
dismissed the appeal and resolved that the said statement was not correct and that it
could be recognized as correct only provided it contained references related to recognised
findings on the harmfulness of certain concentration of sweeteners to human health, or
harmfulness of sweeteners to people of certain groups. The Court pointed out that the
advertisement contains no sweeteners not recommended for human health by the mode of
its presentation might invoke an ordinary consumers incorrect presumption that all
sweeteners in all cases are harmful for human health, and concluded that Resolution No.
2S-6 of 27 March 2003 of the CC was lawful and duly grounded.
Resolution No. 8/b of 18 May 2001 of the CC On the compliance of
actions of AB Mažeikų Nafta and undertakings engaged in oil product marketing
with the requirements of Art. 5 of the LC established that agreements concluded by AB
Mažeikų Nafta and UAB Lukoil Baltija, UAB Lukoil Baltija Servisas, UAB Lietuva
Statoil, UAB Pakrijas, UAB Uotas and UAB Vaizga contained vertical restrictions
whereby they constituted an infringement of par. 1 of Art. 5 of the LC.
Vilnius District Administrative Court, by its decision of 11 September
2003, upheld the appeal of AB Mažeikų Nafta, and revoked the imposition of the
fine, while the appeal of UAB Lukoil Baltija , UAB Lietuva Statoil, UAB
Pakrijas , UAB Uotas and UAB Vaizga were upheld partly, and pecuniary
fines imposed by the CC were reduced.
On 26 January 2004, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania
dismissed the appeal and upheld the ruling of the Court of 1st instance. The Court
resolved that agreements concluded by AB Mažeikų Nafta and UAB Lukoil Baltija,
UAB Lukoil Baltija Servisas, UAB Lietuva Statoil, UAB Pakrijas, UAB Uotas and UAB
Vaizga whereby they established a prohibition to import and market the imported oil
products constituted an infringement of Art. 5 of the LC. However, the Court maintained
that in the view of the continuous character of the infringement, Resolution No.8/b of 18
May 2001 subjected AB Mažeikų Nafta to a repeated sanction for the same
infringement; therefore the pecuniary sanction in respect of the violator was revoked.
By its Resolution No. 1S-110 of 9 October 2003 On the termination of
the investigation of the compliance of Resolution No. 857 of 30 June 2003 of the
Government of the Republic of Lithuania On the amendment of the Resolution No. 851 of 7
June 2002 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania On the approval of the list of
sugar and products containing sugar manufactured in the Republic of Lithuania or
imported with the requirements of Art. 4 of the LC the CC resolved to discontinue
the investigation of the compliance of the Resolution of the Government with the
provisions of the LC. The CC resolved that the said Resolution of the Government was
passed for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements of the Law on Sugar, therefore in
this particular case the exemption set forth in Art. 4 of the LC applies.
The Vilnius District Administrative Court is currently investigating an
appeal lodged by UAB Lavisos Agrogrupė concerning the annulment of Resolution No.
1S-110 of 9 October 2003 of the CC.
1. Bilateral cooperation
The CC has been actively implementing policy targeted at the
strengthening and developing the relations with foreign competition authorities and
international organisations.
Particularly close relations have been maintained with the DG
Competition of the European Commission and the competition authorities of the EU Member
States. Regular professional contacts and consultations were related to the investigations
being conducted, as well as the issues of formation of competition policy.
During the year 2003, both the officials and experts of the CC were
regular attendees of meetings organised by the European Commission.
On 3 December 2003, Mr. Philip Lowe, the Director General of the DG
Competition, together with Mr. Janne Kankanen, an official of the Directorate, paid
official visit to the CC. During the visit the officials of the European Commission met
with the Chairman of the CC, the Council members and other staff members. The subject
matter of the discussions held during such meetings was mostly related to the forthcoming
EU membership of Lithuania and the related qualitative changes in the activity of the CC.
The Chairman of the CC attended the meeting of the Directors General of
the European competition authorities held on 4-5 September 2003 in Oslo and the meeting of
Directors General of national competition authorities held on 19 November 2003 in
Brussels.
On 26-28 November 2003, the Chairman of the CC, together with
colleagues from Denmark and Sweden was invited by the Swedish University of Umea to hold a
seminar on issues of competition law and its implementation for the public servants of
Vietnam and discuss the draft LC of Vietnam.
During the period being reviewed close relations were maintained with
competition authorities of other States. In March, the CC was visited by Mr. I. Yuzhanov,
Minister of the Russian Federation for Antimonopoly Policy and Support of
Entrepreneurship. The visit offered a convenient occasion to exchange the experience
related to the enforcement of competition law both in Lithuania and Russia.
The CC also participated in the Canadian-Ukrainian-Baltic States
economics management-training program. Within the framework of this program, on 3 June and
1-3 December 2003, the CC was visited by six public servants of the Ukraine who were
familiarised with the Lithuanian competition law and its enforcement, and participated in
the exchange of information on the experience of negotiations on the accession of EU in
the area of competition.
2. Multilateral cooperation
During 2003, the CC devoted special attention to the development of
cooperation with OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). Members of
the CC were regular participants in meetings of the OECD Competition Committee and
its working group No.2 Competition and regulation and the working group No.3
International cooperation, as well as in the global forum on competition issues in
Paris. Specialists of the CC were making presentations on objectives of the competition
legislation, optimisation of the structure of the competition authority, harmonisation of
procedures for merger control, commented on some most important issues of competition
policy.
Within the framework of the OECD Baltic Regional Program, a workshop
Competition policy was held on 11-13 June 2003 in Vilnius. The agenda of the
workshop included a range of issues, such as Cartels, and Cooperation among
competition authorities. At the workshop specialists of the CC made three presentations
on issues of cartels and cooperation between the competition authorities.
On the request of the OECD Competition Committee the CC drew up a
Report on Lithuanian competition policy development in 2003 in which it outlined the
principal changes in the competition law and policy, most important aspects of the
activities of the CC and the description of most important investigations.
Furthermore, in 2003 two officials of the CC attended a two-weeks
training session on competition issues organised by the OECD and held at Joint Vienna
Institute in Vienna.
Over the year 2003, the institution continued cooperation with the ICN
(International Competition Network) - the informal information network, which enables
the competition authorities of developed, and developing countries to cooperate in the
enforcement of competition policy and the implementation of common interests in the area
of application of the competition rules. The CC has supplied this organisation with
abundant information on legal acts governing competition law effective in Lithuania, also
on enforcement of competition rules, while attaching special attention to the enforcement
of merger control and development of competition culture in Lithuania.
Chairman of the CC participated in the Second International Conference
of the ICN, which was held on 23-25 June in Merida, Mexico. The principal objective of the
Conference was to familiarise the participants of the Conference with the future plans and
address the issues currently in focus of competition authorities, such as concentration
control and development of competition culture.
One member of the CC participated in the workshop organised by the WTO,
the subject matter whereof was Competition policy and multilateral trading system,
held on 17-18 June 2003, in Budapest, Hungary.
Also officials of the CC attended two meetings of the Informal-working
group on trade and competition set up by the European Commission to discuss issues related
to the WTO Agreement on Competition.
Traditionally, on the request of the United Nations Conference on
Trade and Development (UNCTAD) the CC provided information for the documents being
developed by this organisation in the area of competition law and policy.
On 10 February 2003, a meeting with NATO experts carrying out the
general assessment of the situation in Lithuania was held in Vilnius, in which the CC
officials presented the general overview of the competition policy in Lithuania.
3. Participation in international seminars and conferences
During the year 2003, representatives of the CC attended various
seminars, training courses and conferences on issues of competition law and policy,
arranged by the European Commission, authorities of other Member States and international
organisations.
Two representatives of the CC attended the regular annual 11th
International Conference on Competition held on 18-20 May 2003 in Bonn, Germany.
Two representatives of the CC were invited to participate in the
training courses on EU Competition Policy, organised by the Institute of Public
Administration of Ireland and held on 24 March -2 April 2003 in Dublin and Brussels. The
training courses were specifically designed for the States acceding the EU. Participants
of the courses were offered a presentation on the Irish competition law and its
enforcement, and the activities of the Ireland Competition Authority in the implementation
and enforcement of the EU competition rules. The officials of the European Commission
presented a brief overview on the necessity to modernise the EU competition law and the
essence of such undertaking, also the main changes introduced in the competition law and
its enforcement. The courses served as a valuable possibility to learn more on the process
of the EU enlargements and the experience of Ireland after its accession to the EU.
In 2003, in the same way as in previous years, the DG Competition of
the European Commission and TAIEX (Technical assistance and information exchange bureau)
provided technical assistance by organising training, seminars, and conferences on the
issues of EU Competition Policy and State aid. On the invitation of TAIEX three officials
of the CC were participating in training sessions on competition issues arranged on 19-23
October in Brussels. The main subjects covered by the agenda of the training sessions were
telecommunications, concentration, cartel agreements and the European Competition Network
(ECN). Officials of the DG Competition of the European Commission made a presentation on
the modernisation and decentralisation of competition rules, the forthcoming changes in
the EU merger control regulations, other updates in the enforcement of competition rules,
also significant time was devoted to discussions in issues of competition policy
enforcement.
On 11 January - 6 April 2003 the TAIEX bureau organised training course
on State aid in the European Commission, which was attended by one official of the CC.
Head of the Administration of the CC attended the IV session of the
VIII International competition policy seminar Prospects for multilateral agreement on
competition policy and law held on 29 April - 2 May in Seoul, Korea, where the
representative of the Competition Council made a presentation.
On 16-19 September 2003 the Chairman of the CC participated in the Open
Session of Interstate Antimonopoly Council of CIS countries devoted to Celebration of 10th
Anniversary Globalisation, Integration and Competition Policy held in St.
Petersburg. Representative of the CC presented and overviewed of integration process and
development of national competition policy in Lithuania.
On 12-17 October 2003, two staff members of the CC participated in the workshop on
State aid held in Brussels. The agenda of the workshop covered issues on State aid policy
in the EU, State aid for the restructuring of enterprises, also aid to environmental
protection and energy conservation.
4. Technical assistance
During the year 2003, technical assistance in the area of development
of competition policy was rendered by experts from Denmark who contributed to the drafting
of amendments of the LC and other legal acts (Explanations of the CC on block exemptions
to vertical and horizontal agreements, imposition of fines, etc.).
The Twinning Light project under the PHARE technical assistance program
Reinforcement of the Competition Council (Anti-trust) was prepared back in 2002, but
in view of lengthy negotiations with the project partner who was awarded the project and
with an intermediation of the Central Project Management Agency the contract with the
German Federal Ministry of Economic and Labour was signed only late in 2003. The
implementation of the project will start early in 2004. The main purpose of the project is
to ensure the preparedness to operate in the EU environment, to directly enforce the
relevant EU competition rules, and cooperate with the European Commission and National
Competition Authorities of Member States in the investigation of competition cases falling
within the scope of the EU competition legislation.
Late in 2003, a Twinning Light project Reinforcement of the
Competition Council (State aid) was concluded with the German Federal Ministry of
Economic and Labour. The purpose of the project is to strengthen the institution
authorised to enforce the monitoring of State aid in Lithuania. The implementation of the
project will extend until May 2004.
IV. ADVOCACY AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
Harmonisation of legislation
During 2003, the CC continued to make its active contribution
in the legislation process by presenting proposals and comments in respect of various
draft legal acts prepared by a range of institutions. By assessing the new drafts of legal
acts in the light to requirements of the LC and presenting relevant comments the CC
fulfils a very important mission of consolidation of the principles of fair competition in
legal acts.
Of special significance were the comments presented in respect of the
draft Law on Water Services. The CC opposed to the provision set forth in the draft law
assigning a single operator in the market by granting it exclusive rights to operate for
an unlimited period of time. Other provisions, which were opposed by the CC, concerned an
inducement to take over the operations of the previously active undertakings, and other
provisions of the draft law eliminating competition by legalising local monopolies, and
creating conditions for possible abuse of the dominant position. Such provisions would
come in contradiction of the principle of fair competition enshrined in the Constitution
of the Republic of Lithuania. The procedure for designation of water services provider as
proposed in the draft law would prevent any competition whatsoever, therefore a proposal
was made to designate the water services providers by way of public tenders, also
introduce licences of limited duration which would ensure possibilities for new more
efficient operators to enter the market and maintain at least minimum conditions for
competition in this specific sector.
The CC also disapproved off the Draft Law on the Publicity of Financial
Activities and ensuring of Fair Competition of Retail Trade Enterprises the Annual Sales
Net proceeds whereof exceed LTL 50 m., and the limitations set forth therein. In the
opinion of the CC the attempts to relate the limitations set forth in the Draft Law with
the prohibition of unfair competition are unjustified. Also some doubts were expressed as
to criteria under which the said limitations are related to the threshold of LTL 50 m.,
without referring to the market power of the specific enterprise in the relevant market.
Having regard to the comments presented by the CC and other institutions, the meeting of
Ministers threw out the said Draft Law.
The draft Resolution of the Government On the approval of the Rules
on licensing of trade in explosives included a proposal to empower the Weaponry fund
which itself as independent enterprise operate in the market for trade in explosives, to
issue licences to competing undertakings and to carry out a control over trade in
explosives; such provisions would grant privileges to the Weaponry fund which will ensure
its competitive advantage in respect of other undertakings. The CC experts proposed to the
authors of the draft law ways and methods to ensure equal conditions for competition.
The CC commented in the Draft Law on The mandatory insurance against
civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles. The provisions of the Draft Law
concerned foresees the possibility to the Bureau - the association of insurance companies
authorised to engage in the mandatory insurance against civil liability in respect of the
use of motor vehicles - to access the data accumulated in the information data base at no
charge, while to all other undertakings this service is provided for a fee. In the opinion
of the CC such provisions of the Draft Law could grant a competitive advantage to the
Bureau in respect of other undertakings.
One of the objectives of the Law on Electronic communications is to
ensure effective competition in the electronic communications markets. Therefore the Law
should make a clear distinction of the competences of the Telecommunications Regulatory
Authority and the CC. The Draft Law does not resolve the issue of the currently existing
problem of the division of competence in the telecommunications area, but, rather,
transfers it to the area of electronic communications. The CC presented its comments
concerning the division of competences, function overlapping, unjustified additional
restrictions of the operations of undertakings, and proposed amended wordings of the
relevant provisions of the new Law.
Important comments were offered in respect of the Draft Law on Public
Information, which provided for a function to be assigned to the Lithuanian Radio and
Television Commission to control the compliance of broadcasters and re-broadcasters with
the provisions of legislation governing competition and concentration processes. The
authors of the Draft Law were offered to renounce this provision on the basis that the CC
exercises such control. Furthermore, the CC commented on the provision concerning the
assignment of supervision of political advertising to the CC, since such provision is
viewed as contradicting the mission of the institution.
During the year 2003, significant efforts were dedicated to the
approximation of two Treaties of special importance to Lithuania. First, - the CC actively
participated in the process of technical adaptations of the text of the Treaty of
Accession in the negotiation chapter Competition Policy.
In the course of approval of the text of the EEA Enlargement Agreement
the CC also presented comments within the limits of its competence.
Public relations
Invariably, considerable attention was being paid to dissemination
of information and development of public relations, which has become extremely
instrumental in enhancing of public awareness in competition issues. The society is
becoming increasingly aware of the benefits of passed decisions, and the positive impact
of such decisions not only on the situation in individual markets, but also on the
well-being of consumers. Targeted and consistently presented information on the activities
of the institution and explanations of the passed decisions in the news media enhances the
awareness of benefits of competitive markets and the peculiarities of competition policy
both among representatives of business community and the public at large.
The activities of the CC, the course of investigations and their
outcome have always been in the focus of interest of journalists of both national and
regional publications, television and radio. As compared to previous years, the volume of
information provided on the activities of the institution has increased by nearly 30%
basically due to the new initiative of the CC to place more abundant information in the
Internet website which made this information much easier accessible to regional news
media. Information of issues discussed and decisions passed in meetings of the CC is being
promptly disseminated via the Internet websites of Information agencies BNS and ELTA and
would reach the news media mass faster. Electronic communications means facilitate
efficient provision of information to news media which, in its turn, becomes better
enabled to draw up higher quality analytical publications, and obtain the comments of
experts in competition area on current issues.
Information to the news media was being provided via the means of
communication with the Press Office of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania and the
Public Relations Office of the European Commissions Delegation to Lithuania.
During the year 2003 the CC prepared and presented to the news
media 64 press releases about the decisions passed by the institution and investigations
in progress. Members and specialist of the CC drew up six analytical articles for
specialised publications which mostly covered the peculiarities of applications of the LC
and Advertising, and emphasized the importance of investigations conducted by the CC for
the implementation of the competition policy requirements, as well as the significance of
amendments to the LC proposed by the CC. On 31 occasions officials of the CC were
interviewed by TV and radio journalists, they also participated in numerous TV programs
focusing on competition issues, and in total in four press conferences on the specific
issues related to the investigations carried out by the CC.
Due to the strengthening contacts with editors on economic issues and
representatives of regional news media, in 2003 the number of published articles and press
releases on issues related to the activities of the institution has considerably increased
and reached as many as 420. The news media showed invariable interest in investigations
conducted by the CC and the situation and topicalities in retail trade, fuels,
telecommunications, milk purchase and processing markets. The CC also published abundant
information on investigations concerning misleading advertising.
The news media devoted considerable attention to visits to the CC of
high rank officials, namely, the visit of Mr. I. Yuzhanov, Minister of the Russian
Federation for Antimonopoly Policy and Support to Entrepreneurship in March, and the visit
of Mr. Philip Lowe, the Director General of the Directorate General for Competition of the
European Commission in December. News media representatives were invited to the meetings
with these high rank guests of the CC.
After the Government of the Republic of Lithuania approved the general
requirements for the Internet websites of public authorities, the Internet website of the
CC was updated to bring it in line with the said requirements. The structure of the
website was reorganised, and some updates were introduced in the contents of the website.
The website has been made more convenient for visitors to access to the most updated
information on the activities of the CC and get acquainted with the draft resolutions of
the institution. A new word search facility has been implemented in the website making it
more convenient for the visitors of the website to address the officials of the CC and
receive responses to their inquiries. The Internet website in English has also been
significantly updated and modernised.
The CC submitted updated information in response to the questions
presented by the annual publication on competition policy and regulation issued in London
Global Competition Review - The International Journal of Competition Policy and
Regulation.
Development of public relations and increasingly close cooperation with
news media pose new requirements, primarily in respect of quality and relevance of
presentation of information. It has been increasingly important to present information to
the TV audience and readers of publications in a condensed and relevant manner, thus press
officers of different public authorities have been attending training courses designed to
convey special skills to that effect. During May, October and November officials of the CC
were attending workshops covering the issues on public relations and marketing, formation
of image of the institution, as well as crisis management. The acquired skills and
knowledge facilitates the strengthening of the public repute of the CC as highly qualified
and efficiently operating institution.
V. ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE AND RESOURCES
The Competition Council of the Republic of Lithuania is a public
authority empowered to implement the State competition policy and monitor over the
compliance with the provisions of the LC, also performing other functions assigned to it
by the Law on Monitoring of State Aid to Undertakings, the Law on Advertising and the Law
on Prices. The activities of the Competition Council are funded form the budget of the
Republic of Lithuania, and appropriations of the State budget 2003 amounted to LTL 2.5 m.
Staffing of the Competition Council and its Divisions
The LC defines the powers of the CC composed of the Chairman and four
Members. The most important powers of the institution include the control over the
compliance by undertakings, public and local authorities with the requirements of the LC,
investigation and establishment of infringements of the Law and imposition of sanctions
upon the violators in cases and following the procedure established by the law, and adopt
legal acts within the limits of its competence, and others.
In fulfilling its functions the CC is assisted by the Administration of
the institution the structure and positions whereof is approved by the CC. The functions
of the Administration and its members are defined in the Regulations, approved by the CC.
At the end of the year 2003, the Administration of the CC consisted of
58 employees, 40% of them being men, and women accounting for the remaining 60%. Majority
of the employees are graduates of the university level law or economics studies.
The Head of the Administration of the CC is in charge of its
operations, and deals with issues of organisation of operations and discipline, selection
of employees and improvement of qualifications, financing and other important issues
related to the activities of the institution. The Administration of the CC is composed of
Divisions each performing the functions delegated to it by individual areas of activity.
An appointed Member of the CC is co-ordinating activities of each individual sector.
During 2003, considerable efforts were devoted to the enhancement of
efficiency of operations of individual Divisions of the CC by introducing amendments to
their functions or strengthening their capacities by involving highly qualified
specialists.
Archive and records management
During 2003, the archive files of the CC were compiled and
maintained in the procedure established by the Rules on preparation and recording of
documents approved by the Department of Archives of the Republic of Lithuania. The archive
of the CC has been moved to the premises fully conforming to all relevant requirements.
The computer-aided system for registration of the incoming and outgoing
documents facilitates the management of correspondence of the institution by the so-called
one stop-shop principle, under which the incoming and outgoing documents are
registered and immediately forwarded to specialists according to their competence. The
computerised record management system is not only an efficient tool in the management of
accounting, enforcement of control, it facilitates the monitoring of the flows of
documents and enables a more efficient servicing of persons applying to the CC.
VI. ANNEXES
Decisions passed and sanctions imposed by the Competition Council in 2003
| Enforcement of the LC | ||
| Concerning legal acts passed by public and local authorities (7) | ||
| Refusals to initiate investigations (4) | ||
| Discontinued investigations (3) | ||
| Concerning prohibited agreements (7) | ||
| Established infringements (1): | ||
| 15-07-2003 No.2S-10 | Concerning the compliance of actions of enterprises participating in the tender called in 2002 by PHARE "Procurement of information technologies designed to strengthen the capacity of the Ministry of Agriculture and related institutions to manage and administer EU aquis for agriculture and rural development" (Project LT 0004-01) with items 1 and 6 of par. 1 of Art. 5 of the LC UAB Blue Bridge UAB Aideta UAB Techna Orbis | LTL 50,000 LTL 20,000 LTL 10,000 |
| Exemptions (1): | ||
| 06-11-2003 No.1S-128 | Confirmation that the conference agreement between AB Lisco Baltic Service and Scandlines AG qualify for granting of a block exemption | |
| Refusals to initiate investigations (1) | ||
| Discontinued investigations (4) | ||
| Concerning abuse of a dominant position (6) | ||
| Established infringements (1): | ||
| 08-05-2003 No. 2S-8 | On the compliance with the requirements of Art. 9 of the LC of A. Jankauskas service and trade enterprise A. Jankauskas service and trade enterprise | LTL 3,000 |
| Refusals to initiate investigations (4) | ||
| Discontinued investigations (1) | ||
| Concerning merger control (58) | ||
| Permissions to implement merger (52): | ||
| 06-02-2003 No.1S-8 | E.ON AG to acquire 100% holding of Ruhrgas AG | |
| 27-02-2003 Nr.1S-13 | UAB Vinvesta to acquire 100% holding of AB Sema | |
| 20-03-2003 No.1S-19 | AB Alna and AS Microlink to establish a new joint venture UAB DoclogixOCLOGIX SoftwareOFTWARE by each acquiring a 50% block of shares | |
| 28-03-2003 No.1S-23 | UAB KuusametUUSAMET to acquire 100% holding of UAB AlumedasLUMEDAS | |
| 28-03-2003 No.1S-24 | UAB Baltijos ALTIJOS F inansųINANSŲ VystymoYSTYMO G rupėRUPĖ to acquire up to 100% holding of AB S anitasANITAS | |
| 03-04-2003 No.1S-29 | AB RokiškioOKIŠKIO S ūrisŪRIS to acquire up to 35.3% holding of AB P anevėžioANEVĖŽIO PienasIENAS | |
| 17-04-2003 No.1S-35 | UAB KremiREMI to acquire up to 100% holding of AB SanitasANITAS | |
| 24-04-2003 No.1S-37 | UAB NCC FegdaEGDA to acquire 100% holding of AB KlaipėdosLAIPĖDOS KeliaiELIAI | |
| 24-04-2003 No.1S-38 | V. Saldžiūnas company Baltvita, UAB Bennet Distributors, UAB Birštono Mineraliniai Vandenys and Ko., UAB Biržų Alus, UAB Coca-Cola Bottlers Lietuva, Latvian company Colgate-Palmolive, UAB Daiga, UAB Elmenhorster Vilnius, Finish company Elopak Oy, UAB Eugesta, AB Kalnapilis, UAB Kappa Packaging Baltic, AB Kauno alus, AB Klaipėdos kartonas, UAB Mineraliniai vandenys, V. Adutavičiaus, A. Juozeliūno, J. Tučinsko TŪB Nemuno Banga, UAB Neptūno vandenys, UAB Nestle Baltics, UAB Palink, AB Pieno žvaigždės, Latvian company Procter & Gamble Marketing Latvia, Ltd, UAB Putokšnis, AB Ragutis, Čygas-Kalkis TŪB Rinkuškiai, AB Rokiškio sūris, A.Gricevičius Lithuanian confectionery Rūta, Joint Lithuanian-American venture Sanitex, UAB Šiaulių tara, AB Švyturys-Utenos alus, UAB Tetra Pak Lietuva, UAB TEW Baltija, UAB Trojina, UAB Unilever Lietuva, AB Vilniaus Tauras to establish UAB Žaliasis taškas. | |
| 02-05-2003 No.1S-41 | UAB LimarkoIMARKO and UAB VB R izikosIZIKOS KapitaloAPITALO V aldymasALDYMAS to acquire up to 100% holding and the joint control over AB KlaipėdosLAIPĖDOS TransportoRANSPORTO LaivynasAIVYNAS | |
| 08-05-2003 No.1S-43 | UAB VičiūnaiIČIŪNAI to acquire up to 100% holding of UAB VičiūnaiIČIŪNAI and Ko | |
| 08-05-2003 No.1S-44 | UAB PlungėsLUNGĖS K ooperatinėOOPERATINĖ PrekybaERKYBA to acquire up to 100% holding of UAB KaunoAUNO S aulėtekisAULĖTEKIS | |
| 08-05-2003 No.1S-45 | UAB Plungės Kooperatinė PrekybaUAB PLUNGĖS KOOPERATINĖ PREKYBA to acquire up to 100% holding of UAB V ičiūnaiIČIŪNAI | |
| 08-05-2003 No.1S-46 | BalticALTIC InvestmentNVESTMENT FundUND IIII L.P. to acquire up to 87.34% holding of UAB KraitenėRAITENĖ | |
| 29-025-2003 No.1S-54 | AB GrigiškėsRIGIŠKĖS to take over AB NaujiejiAUJIEJI VerkiaiERKIAI | |
| 05-06-2003 No.1S-57 | UAB MegrameEGRAME, UAB V irataIRATE and UAB PlasmetaLASMETA to establish a joint venture UAB ASF | |
| 05-06-2003 No.1S-58 | UAB ComlietOMLIET to acquire 100% holding of UAB SonexONEX KomunikacijosOMUNIKACIJOS | |
| 12-06-2003 No.1S-61 | UAB MilsaILSA to acquire up to 100% holding of AB GranitasRANITAS | |
| 20-06-2003 No.1S-63 | Lithuanian-American UAB IteraTERA L ietuvaIETUVA to acquire up to 100% of AB S uskystintosUSKYSTINTOS DujosUJOS | |
| 26-06-2003 No.1S-66 | UAB BiovelaIOVELA to acquire up to 100% holding of UAB UtenosTENOS MėsosĖSOS CentrasENTRAS | |
| 03-07-2003 No.1S-69 | AB PanevėžioANEVĖŽIO K eliaiELIAI to acquire 100% of UAB SkanskaKANSKA StatybaTATYBA | |
| 03-07-2003 No.1S-70 | A. Vyšniauskas to acquire up to 85.37% holding of UAB Š altuvaALTUVA and up to 49.63% holding of AB V ilniausILNIAUS MėsosĖSOS K ombinatasOMBINATAS and in cooperation with UAB Š altuvaALTUVA to acquire a joint control of AB V ilniausILNIAUS MėsosĖSOS K ombinatasOMBINATAS | |
| 10-07-2003 No.1S-71 | UAB BaltijosALTIJOS FinansųINANSŲ VystymoYSTYMO GrupėRUPĖ and UAB KremiREMI to acquire a joint control over AB SanitasANITAS | |
| 28-08-2003 No.1S-84 | YIT CorporationORPORATION to acquire 100% holding of UAB ABB TechnikaECHNIKA | |
| 28-08-2003 No.1S-85 | UAB IrvingaRVINGA and UAB B altlantaALTLANTA to acquire 100% holding of AB L aivitėAIVITĖ and acquire a joint control | |
| 28-28-2003 No.1S-86 | ŽŪB DžeiranaŽEIRANA to acquire up to 100% holding of AB GrąžtaiRĄŽTAI | |
| 28-08-2003 No.1S-87 | BP p.l.c., AlfaLFA F inanceINANCE HoldingsOLDINGS SA, AI PetroleumETROLEUM HoldingsOLDINGS LLC, ArsanRSAN HoldingOLDIG S ar 1 to establish a joint venture | |
| 03-09-2003 No.1S-88 | AB Mažeikių AŽEIKIŲ N aftaAFTA to acquire 100% holding of UAB U otasOTAS | |
| 11-09-2003 No.1S-92 | AB KaunoAUNO GrūdaiRŪDAI to acquire up to 85% AB VilniausILNIAUS P aukštynasAUKŠTYNAS | |
| 11-09-2003 No.1S-93 | SobieskiOBIESKI DystrybucjaYSTRYBUCJA Sp.z.o.o. to acquire 82.27% holding of AB VilniausILNIAUS DegtinėEGTINĖ | |
| 25-09-2003 No.1S-100 | Sobieski DystrybucjaSOBIESKI DYSTRYBUCJA Sp.z.o.o. to acquire 100% holding of AB Vilniaus Degtinė AB VILNIAUS DEGTINĖ | |
| 25-09-2003 No.1S-101 | UAB BetonetaETONETA to acquire up to 100% holding of AB MarkučiaiARKUČIAI | |
| 25-09-2003 No.1S-102 | UAB ArtrioRTRIO-2 to acquire up to 100% holding of AB AnykščiųNYKŠČIŲ V ynasYNAS | |
| 02-10-2003 No.1S-107 | UAB MineraliniaiINERALINIAI V andenysANDENYS to acquire up to 100% holding of AB S tumbrasTUMBRAS | |
| 09-10-2003 No.1S-112 | UAB FinansųINANSŲ SpektrasPEKTRAS to acquire up to 100% holding of KIB InvetexNVETEX | |
| 23-10-2003 No.1S-118 | AB RokiškioOKIŠKIO S ūrisŪRIS to acquire up to 100% holding of UAB K aloraALORA | |
| 23-10-2003 No.1S-119 | UAB LiteskoITESKO to lease the assets of SP UAB BiržųIRŽŲ ŠilumosILUMOS TinklaiINKLAI | |
| 30-10-2003 No.1S-121 | ProcterROCTER&GambleAMBLE GermanyERMANY ManagementANAGEMENT GmbH to acquire up to 100% holding of WellaELLA AG | |
| 06-11-2003 No.1S-125 | UAB LiteskoITESKO to lease SP UAB D ruskininkųRUSKININKŲ ŠilumosILUMOS TinklaiINKLAI | |
| 06-11-2003 No.1S-126 | UAB BaltischesALTISCHES H ausAUS to acquire up to 100% holding of UAB P asidarykASIDARYK PatsATS | |
| 06-11-2003 No.1S-127 | UAB AibėsIBĖS MažmenaAŽMENA conclude service agreements with AB PasvalioASVALIO Ž emtiekimasEMTIEKIMAS, UAB KilminėILMINĖ | |
| 13-11-2003 No.1S-131 | AB BankasANKAS "HansabankasANSABANKAS" to acquire up to 100% holding of UAB LietuvosIETUVOS DraudimoRAUDIMO GyvybėsYVYBĖS DraudimasRAUDIMAS | |
| 04-12-2003 No.1S-134 | TchiboCHIBO HoldingOLDING AG to acquire a 51.46% holding of BeiersdorfEIERSDORF AG, granting 57.01% of voting rights | |
| 11-12-2003 No.1S-140 | TeliaELIA SoneraONERA AB to acquire up to 100% holding of UAB OmnitelMNITEL through a subsidiary AmberMBER MobileOBILE TeleholdingELEHOLDING AB | |
| 11-12-2003 NO.1S-141 | UAB KonversbankONVERSBANK and AB IncorionNCORION InvestmentNVESTMENT HoldingOLDING CompanyOMPANY to acquire up to 66.7% holding of AB BankasANKAS SnorasNORAS and acquire a joint control | |
| 11-12-2003 No.1S-142 | A.Bosas to acquire up to 100% holding of AB KlaipėdosLAIPĖDOS KranaiRANAI | |
| 18-12-2003 No.1S-145 | UAB TelivestaELIVESTA to acquire up to 100% holding of UAB LietuvosIETUVOS KinoINO StudijaTUDIJA | |
| 18-12-2003 No.1S-146 | UAB AibėsIBĖS MažmenaAŽMENA to conclude a service agreement with UAB ŽiburysIBURYS | |
| 18-12-2003 No.1S-147 | UAB Aibės Mažmena UAB AIBĖS MAŽMENA to conclude a service agreement with UAB SkibalėKIBALĖ | |
| 18-12-2003 No.1S-148 | UAB LekėčiaiEKĖČIAI, UAB JosvainiųOSVAINIŲ BekonasEKONAS, ŽŪB ŠešupėEŠUPĖ, AB MarijampolėsARIJAMPOLĖS GrūdaiRŪDAI, A. Matusevičius and G. Kateiva to establish a joint venture ŽŪB KalvarijųALVARIJŲ BekonasEKONAS | |
| 18-12-2003 No.1S-149 | UAB JosvainiųOSVAINIŲ BekonasEKONAS, UAB LitagrosITAGROS ChemijaCHEMIJA, M. Matusevičius, P. Matusevičius, D. Grigaliūnas and G. Kateiva to establish a joint venture ŽŪB ParšeliųARŠELIŲ GausaAUSA | |
| 18-12-2003 No.1S-150 | UAB NDX EnergijaNERGIJA to acquire up to 100% holding of AB VakarųAKARŲ SkirstomiejiKIRSTOMIEJI TinklaiINKLAI | |
| Permissions to perform individual actions of concentration (5): | ||
| 06-03-2003 No. 1S-16 | UAB Baltijos Finansų Vystymo Grupė by acquiring a 100% holding of AB Sanitas | |
| 17-04-2003 No. 1S-36 | Baltic Investment Fund III L.P. by acquiring up to 87.34% holding of UAB Kraitenė | |
| 29-05-2003 No. 1S-53 | Lithuanian-American UAB Itera Lietuva to acquire up to 100% holding of AB Suskystintos Dujos | |
| 18-09-2003 No. 1S-99 | Sobieski Dystrybucja SP.z.o.o. by acquiring up to 100% holding of AB Vilniaus Degtinė | |
| 24-12-2003 No. 1S-152 | UAB MG Baltic Investment by acquiring 100% holding of UAB Marieberg Media | |
| Refusal to initiate investigations (1) | ||
| Enforcement of the Law on Advertising | ||
| Concerning misleading and comparative advertising (21) | ||
| Established infringements (9): | ||
| 16-01-2003 No. 2S-1 | AB Stumbras advertising of the strong drink "Dozė" | |
| 16-01-2003 No. 2S-2 | UAB Tele 2 advertising of the discount to users of "Joker" services | |
| 06-02-2003 No. 2S-3 | Comparative advertising of UAB Rubikon Apskaitos Sistemos | |
| 27-03-2003 No. 2S-5 | Nordea Bank Finland PLC Lithuanian branch advertising of the cash withdrawal from Vilniaus Bankas ATM and branches of the Bank | |
| 27-03-2003 No. 2S-6 | UAB Baltijos Mineralinių Vandenų Kompanija advertising of the lemonade "Gaja" | |
| 08-05-2003 No. 2S-7 | UAB Biogloba advertising of the preparation "Slim Caps" | LTL 5,000 |
| 26-06-2003 No. 2S-9 | AB Lietuvos Telekomas advertising of the call forwarding service | |
| 13-11-2003 No. 2S-12 | SE Vėjo Sala advertising of the acquisition of tickets to Marilyn Manson concert SE Vėjo Sala | LTL 8,000 |
| 13-11-2003 No. 2S-13 | UAB Brand Sellers DDB advertising of the pre-paid mobile telecommunications service "Extra" | |
| Refusals to initiate investigations (9) | ||
| Investigations closed (3) | ||
| Penalties imposed in 2003 LTL 96,000 | ||
TOTAL NATIONAL STATE AID IN LIETHUANIA IN 2002
| Methods of State aid Sector | A1 | A2 | B1 | C1 | C2 | D1 | Total (LTL m) | Total (MEUR) |
| 1.1. Agriculture*, ** | 4.93 | 4.93 | 1.43 | |||||
| 1.2. Fisheries | ||||||||
| 2. Industry/services | 88.16 | 127.19 | 38.45 | 0.07 | 253.87 | 73.53 | ||
| 2.1. Horizontal aid | 3.73 | 106.51 | 38.14 | 148.38 | 42.97 | |||
| 2.1.1. Research and development and innovations | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.36 | |||||
| 2.1.2. Environmental protection | ||||||||
| 2.1.3. Small and medium-sized enterprises | 5.82 | 5.82 | 1.69 | |||||
| 2.1.4. Trade | 2.42 | 2.42 | 0.7 | |||||
| 2.1.5. Energy efficiency | ||||||||
| 2.1.6. Investment | ||||||||
| 2.1.7. Employment programs | ||||||||
| 2.1.8. Improvement of qualifications | ||||||||
| 2.1.9. Privatisation | ||||||||
| 2.1.10. Rescue/restucturing | 0.06 | 100.69 | 38.14 | 138.89 | 40.22 | |||
| 2.2. Sektoral aid | 83.97 | 17.63 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 101.88 | 29.51 | ||
| 2.2.1. Steel industry | ||||||||
| 2.2.2. Ship-building | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||||
| 2.2.3. Transport | 83.97 | 17.6 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 101.85 | 29.5 | ||
| 2.2.4. Coal industry | ||||||||
| 2.2.5. Synthetic fibre | ||||||||
| 2.2.6. Other sectors | ||||||||
| 2.3. Regional aid | 0.46 | 3.05 | 0.1 | 3.61 | 1.05 | |||
| TOTAL : | 93.09 | 127.19 | 38.45 | 0.07 | 258.8 | 74.96 | ||
| Manufacturing industry and services | 4.19 | 109.59 | 38.24 | 152.02 | 44.03 |
*The Table includes the data on State aid granted from the
State and municipal budgets
**The data on State aid to agriculture are not broken down by methods
of the State aid
SYMBOLS:
A1 - grants, subsidies
A2 - tax exemptions, tax reductions, write-off of late interest and penalties,
other exemptions
B1 - equity participation
C1 - soft loans
C2 - tax deferrals
D1 - State guarantees
TOTAL NATIONAL STATE AID IN LITHUANIA IN 1996-2002 *
MEUR
| Years Indicators | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 |
| Total national State aid | 173.28 | 114.98 | 99.05 | 45.47 | 68.70 | 39.73 | 74.96 |
| Including: | |||||||
| - manufacturing industry and services | 162.02 | 63.55 | 56.00 | 8.68 | 42.07 | 17.26 | 44.03 |
| - agriculture* | 0.03 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.82 | 1.43 |
| - financial services | 0.17 | 6.63 | 5.17 | 0.83 | |||
| - transport | 11.06 | 44.02 | 37.11 | 35.76 | 26.20 | 21.65 | 29.50 |
*The Table includes data on State aid granted
from the State and municipal budgets excluding the funds of the Rural support program.
NATIONAL STATE AID IN LITHUANIA IN 1996-2002 *
| Years Indicators | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 |
| MEUR | 173.28 | 114.98 | 99.05 | 45.47 | 68.70 | 39.73 | 74.96 |
| EUR per one employee | 104.43 | 68.88 | 59.82 | 27.60 | 43.32 | 26.11 | 53.31 |
| % of GDP (at current prices) | 2.86 | 1.36 | 1.03 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.29 | 0.51 |
| % of national budget expenditures | 12.04 | 6.05 | 4.49 | 2.02 | 2.81 | 1.36 | 2.22 |
| % of national budget deficit | 114.00 | 139.00 | 83.00 | 147.00 | 66.50 | 13.21 | 23.50 |
| Residents (m) | 3.71 | 3.70 | 3.70 | 3.69 | 3.70 | 3.48 | 3.47 |
*The Table includes data on State aid granted from the State and municipal budgets excluding the funds of the Rural support program.
METHODS OF STATE AID GRANTED IN 1996-2002
| A1 | A2 | B1 | C1 | C2 | D1 | Total (LTL m) | Total (MEUR) | |
| State aid in 1996 | 48.29 | 556.28 | 98.16 | 57.32 | 8.37 | 136.00 | 904.42 | 173.28 |
| State aid in 1997 | 109.94 | 40.52 | 250.50 | 0.78 | 2.80 | 116.10 | 520.64 | 114.98 |
| State aid in 1998 | 109.08 | 51.73 | 11.75 | 2.77 | 1.83 | 267.80 | 444.96 | 99.05 |
| State aid in 1999 | 159.59 | 2.17 | 11.01 | 1.82 | 0.04 | 9.46 | 184.09 | 45.47 |
| State aid in 2000 | 225.55 | 7.45 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 22.48 | 255.62 | 68.70 |
| State aid in 2001 | 87.99 | 24.50 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 27.54 | 0.00 | 140.10 | 39.73 |
| State aid in 2002 | 93.09 | 127.19 | 38.45 | 0.07 | 258.8 | 74.96 |
SYMBOLS:
A1 - grants, subsidies
A2 - tax exemptions, tax reductions, write-off of late interest and penalties,
other exemptions
B1 - equity participation
C1 - soft loans
C2 - tax deferrals
D1 - State guarantees
NATIONAL STATE AID IN LITHUANIA IN 1998-2002, MEUR
STATE AID ASSESSED BY RESOLUTIONS OF THE COMPETITION COUNCIL IN 2003
| Notification received | Aided enterprise | No. of Resolution of the CC, date | Decision |
| 22-10-2002 | No. 1S-9 12-03-2003 | Conditional approval | |
| 23-06-2003 | UAB Marijampolės Statyba | No. 1S-73 15-07-2003 | Approved |
| 28-02-2003 | UAB Panevėžio Aurida | No. 1S-89 03-09-2003 | Conditional approval |
| 28-02-2003 | AB Statybos Apdailos Mašinos | No. 1S-91 11-09-2003 | Disapproved |
| 30-09-2003 | Lithuanian-Russian UAB Gargždų Mida | No. 1S-109 09-10-2003 | Approved |
| 31-07-2003 | Šiauliai enterprise of Lithuanian Union of the blind and the visually handicapped people | No. 1S-135 04-12-2003 | Approved |
| Initiated by CC | Aid by Sodra to 10 enterprises | No. 1S-56 29-05-2003 | To open the state aid case |
Total letters received - 6, approved - 3, conditional approvals - 2,
disapproved-1, State aid case opened - 1.



