Processing of your personal data

This website might use cookies or other personal data for the purposes of the functioning of the website. Some of these cookies are mandatory, while the other ones only help us to improve your browsing experience and get information on how the website is used.

Privacy policy

All news

Filter by:
Advertising.jpg
KONKURENCIJOS TARYBA WILL TRANSFER ITS FUNCTIONS RELATING TO MISLEADING AND COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
29 04 2019

From May 1, after the amendments to the Law on Advertising have entered into force, the Lithuanian competition authority Konkurencijos taryba will transfer its functions relating to the supervision of misleading and comparative advertising to the State Consumer Rights Protection Authority (SCRPA).

Pigu.jpg
IN COURT PIGU DID NOT AVOID LIABILITY FOR MISLEADING ADVERTISING
01 10 2018

Vilnius Regional Administrative Court (Court) upheld the decision of the Lithuanian competition authority Konkurencijos taryba whereby it imposed a fine on the company Pigu for misleading advertising.

COURT DID NOT REJECT LIABILITY FOR MISLEADING ADVERTISING
08 03 2018

Vilnius Regional Administrative Court (Court) rejected the complaints by NT partneriai and Karolinos turas and upheld the Lithuanian Competition Council’s decision, according to which the companies were fined for misleading advertising.

KAUNO BŪSTAI MISLED CONSUMERS BY ADVERTISING GUEST HOUSES AS APARTMENTS
28 11 2017

The firm Kauno būstai misled consumers by advertising guest houses as apartments. For the infringement of the Law on Advertising Kauno būstai received EUR 6,300 fine .

Reklama_klaidino.jpg
COMPETITION COUNCIL IMPOSED FINE FOR MISLEADING ADVERTISING
17 10 2017

The Competition Council found that UAB Judira disseminated misleading advertising claims about the mat, head massage system and orthopedic pillow. For the infringement of the Law on Advertising the Council fined Judira EUR 1,230.

REAL ESTATE ADVERTISING TURNED INTO FINES
03 10 2017

On October 2 the Competition Council found that UAB Karolinos turas and UAB NT partneriai misled consumers by advertising hotel premises as residential real estate. For the infringement of the Law on Advertising, the Council fined each of the companies EUR 8,688. 

Svečiai iš Albanijos.jpg
ALBANIAN DELEGATION LEARNED ABOUT CONSUMER PROTECTION IN ADVERTISING
18 07 2017

Chief Experts of Unfair Commercial Practices Investigation Division shared the Competition Council‘s experience on misleading and prohibited comparative advertising with the Albanian Consumer Protection Commission.

SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OT LITHUANIA: ADVERTISING BY UAB MEDIASHOP MISLED CONSUMERS
02 03 2017

On February 28 the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (Court) upheld the Competition Council’s decision of 10 December 2015 whereby UAB Mediashop (Company) was fined EUR 2 244 for misleading advertising.

slaideriui.jpg
VILNIUS REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: UAB PIGU MISLED CONSUMERS
03 10 2016

Vilnius Regional Administrative Court (hereinafter – Court) rejected the appeal by UAB Pigu (hereinafter – Company) against the Competition Council‘s (hereinafter – Council) decision of 16 June 2016 whereby the Company disseminated misleading perfume and home appliance advertisements and thus breached Article 5 of the Law on Advertising.

medications-342466_1920 (640x427).jpg
COMPETITION COUNCIL: ADVERTISING BY CAMELIA MISLED CONSUMERS
06 09 2016

The Competition Council (hereinafter – Council) found that UAB Nemuno vaistinė (hereinafter – Company) made false claims about 30 per cent cheaper products sold in the pharmacies of Camelia (hereinafter – Camelia ), and thus breached Article 5 of the Law on Advertising.

Items
per page
12 out of 87
1 2 3 4 ... 8 Next