All news

Filter by:
VAAT.jpg
COURT: THERE WAS LEGITIMATE BASIS TO IMPOSE FINES ON BID RIGGING PARTICIPANTS
09 08 2017

Vilnius Regional Administrative Court (Court) upheld the Competition Council’s decision, according to which a bid rigging agreement was concluded by the companies acting in the municipal waste collection and transportation sector. The infringement of the Law on Competition resulted in fines.

Statybų_bendrovės.jpg
CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES  DID NOT ESCAPE FINES FOR IMITATING COMPETITION
04 08 2017

The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (Court) upheld the Competition Council’s decision, according to which in 2011–2012 construction companies concluded bid rigging agreements and received fines.

SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OT LITHUANIA: ADVERTISING BY UAB MEDIASHOP MISLED CONSUMERS
02 03 2017

On February 28 the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (Court) upheld the Competition Council’s decision of 10 December 2015 whereby UAB Mediashop (Company) was fined EUR 2 244 for misleading advertising.

VILNIUS REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT UPHELD COMPETITION COUNCIL‘S DECISION ON CARTEL AMONG CINEMA OPERATORS
20 06 2016

Vilnius Regional Administrative Court (hereinafter – Court) rejected the appeal by UAB Forum Cinemas (hereinafter – Company) against the Competition Council‘s decision whereby the Company was fined EUR 1 384 300 for concluding an anti-competitive agreement.

iStock_000076830919_Full (640x427).jpg
SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD COMPETITION COUNCIL‘S DECISON ON 10-YEAR-LONG ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN MAXIMA LT AND UAB MANTINGA  
20 06 2016

The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (hereinafter – Court) rejected the appeals by MAXIMA LT, UAB (hereinafter – MAXIMA LT ) and UAB Mantinga and upheld the Competition Council‘s decision, according to which, the aforementioned companies concluded an anti-competitive agreement.

Items
per page
5 out of 5