All news

Filter by:
SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OT LITHUANIA: ADVERTISING BY UAB MEDIASHOP MISLED CONSUMERS
02 03 2017

On February 28 the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (Court) upheld the Competition Council’s decision of 10 December 2015 whereby UAB Mediashop (Company) was fined EUR 2 244 for misleading advertising.

2803_8a0cd9a800ff6ddfee731e53d2cea633.jpg
SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT UPHELD COUNCIL‘S DECISION IN GAZPROM CASE
23 12 2016

On December 22 the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (hereinafter – SACL) upheld the Competition Council‘s (hereinafter – Council) decision of 2014 whereby Gazprom   received a fine of more than EUR 35 million – Gazprom created obstacles for AB Lietuvos energijos gamyba to purchase natural gas from other supplier.

slaideriui.jpg
VILNIUS REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: UAB PIGU MISLED CONSUMERS
03 10 2016

Vilnius Regional Administrative Court (hereinafter – Court) rejected the appeal by UAB Pigu (hereinafter – Company) against the Competition Council‘s (hereinafter – Council) decision of 16 June 2016 whereby the Company disseminated misleading perfume and home appliance advertisements and thus breached Article 5 of the Law on Advertising.

photo-1443110189928-4448af4a2bc5.jpg
UAB MANTINGA PAID A FINE FOR A 10-YEAR-LONG ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENT
06 09 2016

Last week after the final ruling of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania UAB Mantinga paid a fine of EUR 2 151 417 and EUR 192 569 of interest. The Competition Council (hereinafter – Council) fined UAB Mantinga for a 10-year-long anti-competitive agreement with MAXIMA LT, UAB (hereinafter – MAXIMA LT ). The parties...

iStock_000075671917_Full - Copy (1280x893) (640x447).jpg
TRAKAI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY CONTINUES GRANTING PRIVILEGES TO UAB TRAKŲ PASLAUGOS
28 07 2016

The Competition Council (hereinafter – the Council) found that Trakai District Municipality (hereinafter – Municipality) did not create non-discriminatory conditions for undertakings willing to execute maintenance works of public areas in Trakai District and, thus, failed to comply with the obligations imposed by the Council.

MAXIMA LT sumokėjo baudą.jpg
MAXIMA LT PAID A FINE OF EUR 13 666 216 FOR AN ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENT
07 07 2016

After the final ruling of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania MAXIMA LT, UAB ( MAXIMA LT ) paid a cartel fine of EUR 13 666 216 and EUR 1 082 095,46 of interest. The Competition Council fined MAXIMA LT  for a 10-year-long anti-competitive agreement with UAB Mantinga . The parties agreed to refrain from selling...

iStock_000012540045_Large (640x566).jpg
COMPETITION COUNCIL - ONE OF THE BEST STATE INSTITUTIONS IN LITHUANIA
01 07 2016

A weekly news magazine Veidas honoured the best state institutions and civil servants, including the Lithuanian Competition Council. 

iStock_000076830919_Full (640x427).jpg
SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD COMPETITION COUNCIL‘S DECISON ON 10-YEAR-LONG ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN MAXIMA LT AND UAB MANTINGA  
20 06 2016

The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (hereinafter – Court) rejected the appeals by MAXIMA LT, UAB (hereinafter – MAXIMA LT ) and UAB Mantinga and upheld the Competition Council‘s decision, according to which, the aforementioned companies concluded an anti-competitive agreement.

SUPREME COURT UPHELD KT DECISION ON CARTEL AMONG TRAVEL AGENCIES
03 05 2016

The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (Supreme Court) upheld Lithuanian Competition Council‘s (KT) decision that 29 travel agencies used online booking system E-TURAS to concert practices when applying discounts to bookings and thus breached competition law.

Items
per page
12 out of 25
1 2 3 Next