All news

Filter by:
SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF LITHUANIA: PANEVĖŽYS CITY MUNICIPALITY BREACHED COMPETITION LAW
29 01 2018

The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (Court) rejected the appeals by Panevėžys City Municipality and the company Panevėžys specialus autotransportas and upheld the Lithuanian Competition Council’s decision, according to which the Municipality was found to have breached the Law on Competition by authorising its company to provide municipal waste management services without a competitive procedure.

susitarimas_statybos.jpg
COMPETITION COUNCIL: JOINT BIDDING OF TWO CONSTRUCTION FIRMS RESTRICTED COMPETITION
21 12 2017

The Competition Council found that joint bids submitted by two Lithuanian construction firms UAB Irdaiva and AB Panevėžio statybos trestas (PST) restricted competition “by object”, in breach of Article 5 of the Law on Competition (national equivalent of Article 101 TFEU), as both firms could have bid separately. The fines imposed on firms...

SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD COMPETITION COUNCIL’S DECISION ON BID RIDDING
25 09 2017

The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (Court) upheld the Competition Council’s decision on two bid rigging agreements.

SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: ORDERS OF MINISTER OF INTERIOR RESTRICTED FAIR COMPETITION
13 09 2017

The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania acknowledged that in 2004 and 2005 the Minister of the Interior adopted legal acts which granted exclusive rights to the state enterprise Infostruktūra and thus restricted the freedom of economic activity. According to the Court, such legal regulation infringed the constitutional principle of the rule of law.

VAAT.jpg
COURT: THERE WAS LEGITIMATE BASIS TO IMPOSE FINES ON BID RIGGING PARTICIPANTS
09 08 2017

Vilnius Regional Administrative Court (Court) upheld the Competition Council’s decision, according to which a bid rigging agreement was concluded by the companies acting in the municipal waste collection and transportation sector. The infringement of the Law on Competition resulted in fines.

Statybų_bendrovės.jpg
CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES  DID NOT ESCAPE FINES FOR IMITATING COMPETITION
04 08 2017

The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (Court) upheld the Competition Council’s decision, according to which in 2011–2012 construction companies concluded bid rigging agreements.

Egipto_prokuraturos_vizitas.jpg
EGYPTIAN PUBLIC PROSECUTION OFFICE LEARNED ABOUT COMPETITION COUNCIL’S ACTIVITIES
03 08 2017

On 1–3 August representatives from the Egyptian Public Prosecution Office learned about the Competition Council’s experience while ensuring effective competition for the benefit of consumers.

IN 2016 ONE EURO INVESTED IN COMPETITION COUNCIL BROUGHT ALMOST 8 EUROS IN RETURN
14 06 2017

On June 14 the Chairman Šarūnas Keserauskas presented the Competition Council‘s annual report to the members of the Cabinet.

COURT REJECTED COMPLAINT BY CARTEL PARTICIPANT UAB VORTEX CAPITAL
12 06 2017

Vilnius Regional Administrative Court upheld the Council’s decision, according to which UAB Elmis, UAB LEDEVILA and UAB Vortex Capital were fined for bid-rigging in the public procurement for the purchase of construction and installation works.

Pasiūlymų derinimas.png
VILNIUS REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: UAB ŽAGARĖS INŽINERIJA AND UAB ROVALTRA RIGGED THEIR BIDS
28 04 2017

Vilnius Regional Administrative Court (Court) upheld the Competition Council’s decision of 5 December 2016, according to which UAB Žagarės inžinerija and UAB Rovaltra (Companies) rigged their bids in the public procurement for the purchase of machinery organized by UAB Fontas LT .

Sutartis.jpg
COMPETITION COUNCIL SIGNED COLLABORATION AGREEMENT WITH PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OFFICE  AND SPECIAL INVESTIGATION SERVICE  
17 02 2017

Heads of the Competition Council, the Public  Procurement Office and the Special Investigation Service have signed a collaboration agreement.

Nuotrauka.png
ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION WORKS SECTOR
24 01 2017

The Competition Council found that UAB Elmis, UAB LEDEVILA and UAB Vortex Capital (Companies) concluded a collusive bidding agreement while participating in the public procurement for the purchase of construction and installation works.

Items
per page
12 out of 32
1 2 3 Next