Processing of your personal data

This website might use cookies or other personal data for the purposes of the functioning of the website. Some of these cookies are mandatory, while the other ones only help us to improve your browsing experience and get information on how the website is used.

Privacy message

Anti-competitive agreements

Article 5 of the Law on Competition and Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union prohibit agreements between companies which prevent, restrict or distort competition, and the breach of these laws may result in heavy fines. Anti-competitive agreements include, for example, price-fixing or market-sharing cartels which do not create other companies competitive pressure for launching new products, improving their quality and decreasing prices, which leads to higher prices for consumers.

Agreements indicated below are generally considered anti-competitive:

  • fixing prices;
  • limiting production;
  • sharing markets or customers;
  • sharing commercially sensitive information;
  • bid rigging;
  • fixing resale prices (between manufacturers and distributors).

Vertical agreements, which are concluded between two or more undertakings operating at different levels of the production or distribution chain, do not normally restrict competition when they determine the price and quantity for a specific sale and purchase transaction. Although a restriction of competition may occur if the agreement contains restraints on the supplier or buyer, vertical agreements might have positive effects and may help a manufacturer to enter a new market.

The General Block Exemption Regulation and the Guidelines on Vertical Restraints adopted by the European Commission help other companies conduct their own assessment of vertical agreements of different categories. The Competition Council takes into consideration the provisions set out in the aforementioned Guidelines as well.

Hardcore restrictions

Irrespective of the occupied market share, vertical agreements that encompass hardcore restrictions (Article 4 of the General block exemption) and inflict harm on the consumers are considered breaching competition law.

  • The first hardcore restriction concerns resale price maintenance;
  • Online sales restrictions are prohibited as well, unless certain objective reasons can justify them.

Examples of vertical agreements:

  • Exclusive distribution (points 151-167 of the Guidelines);
  • Selective distribution  (points 174-188 of the Guidelines);
  • Single branding (points 129-148 of the Guidelines);
  • Exclusive supply (points 192-201 of the Guidelines);
  • Franchise agreements (points 43-45, 189-191 of the Guidelines).

Participating in a cartel may result in:

  • a fine of up to 10 per cent of the gross annual income in the preceding business year;
  • personal liability for the manager of the enterprise – restricted right to occupy the managing position for a 3 to 5 year-term and a fine of 14,481 EUR;
  • disqualification from public procurement for up to 3 years;
  • victim‘s claims for damages;
  • loss of good repute.

Companies co-operating with the Council during the investigation into a cartel, submitting with all the details of the cartel prior to its investigation or those which had not initiated the cartel may be exempted from fines or granted reductions in the fines of up to 75 %, which would otherwise have been imposed upon them.

If you have evidence about a possible anti-competitive agreement, you can submit it to Konkurencijos taryba and receive a financial award. As envisaged by the Law on Competition, a whistleblower remuneration will constitute 1 per cent of the fines imposed on the infringers, and might range from EUR 1,000 to EUR 100,000.

Evidence of an anti-competitive agreement refers to all relevant data used by Konkurencijos taryba when conducting an investigation and disclosing a  a competition law infringement.

Whistleblowers can expect to receive remuneration if:  

  • they first provide relevant information prior to the authority's decision to open an investigation;
  • the evidence in question was gathered in a legal manner.

Persons are invited to provide evidence to Konkurencijos taryba by:

Important: upon request, the identity of whistleblowers will not be disclosed to the parties of the investigation procedure, including undertakings suspected of a competition law infringement.

Any doubts?

If you consider providing evidence about an anti-competitive agreement and want to receive more information, you can anonymously contact Konkurencijos taryba for individual consultation with the authority‘s experts by phone +370 5 212 6641 or e-mail Should you decide not to submit evidence after the consultation, information disclosed to the authority will be kept confidential.