![iStock_000075671917_Full - Copy (1280x893) (640x447).jpg](http://kt.gov.lt/uploads/news/images/476x300_crop/2649_97adc00e8a61311d62d96383800811f4.jpg)
The Competition Council (hereinafter – the Council) found that Trakai District Municipality (hereinafter – Municipality) did not create non-discriminatory conditions for undertakings willing to execute maintenance works of public areas in Trakai District and, thus, failed to comply with the obligations imposed by the Council.
![MAXIMA LT sumokėjo baudą.jpg](http://kt.gov.lt/uploads/news/images/476x300_crop/2638_c8735aa4dc0f15af7a664059b4cd9e30.jpg)
After the final ruling of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania MAXIMA LT, UAB ( MAXIMA LT ) paid a cartel fine of EUR 13 666 216 and EUR 1 082 095,46 of interest. The Competition Council fined MAXIMA LT for a 10-year-long anti-competitive agreement with UAB Mantinga . The parties agreed to refrain from selling...
![iStock_000012540045_Large (640x566).jpg](http://kt.gov.lt/uploads/news/images/476x300_crop/2606_44d504848bc34b145162de56573623d4.jpg)
A weekly news magazine Veidas honoured the best state institutions and civil servants, including the Lithuanian Competition Council.
![iStock_000076830919_Full (640x427).jpg](http://kt.gov.lt/uploads/news/images/476x300_crop/2604_4d0ff8dd8d58455494226742bc022f4a.jpg)
The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (hereinafter – Court) rejected the appeals by MAXIMA LT, UAB (hereinafter – MAXIMA LT ) and UAB Mantinga and upheld the Competition Council‘s decision, according to which, the aforementioned companies concluded an anti-competitive agreement.
The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (Supreme Court) upheld Lithuanian Competition Council‘s (KT) decision that 29 travel agencies used online booking system E-TURAS to concert practices when applying discounts to bookings and thus breached competition law.